Known Participant

Frage

non-compliant images

Forum|Forum|2 years ago
February 24, 2024
4 Antworten
3141 Ansichten

I recently had 16 images rejected for being "non-compliant images". Possible reasons include:

-Non compliant use of another artist’s name.

- Undeclared Generative AI Content.

- Content not compliant with overall guidelines

None of those apply as far as I know.

They are photos. They are my photos. I didn't use another artist's name. I used no AI-generated content. What overall guidelines do they not comply with? I'll attach images and you can tell me what I need to do differently

[moderator detached from unrelated discussion]

Contributor critique

Dieses Thema wurde für Antworten geschlossen.

George_F

Community Expert

Keywords and titles are a good place to check for a non-compliance rejection. Making sure they are all in the same language and there aren't any copyrighted or trademarked terms in them.

George F, Photographer & Forum Volunteer

T

Thomas_MorrisAutor

Known Participant

Ah! I'll recheck those to confirm. Question: If I use the word "shiitake" for a mushroom image, will that get flagged as a different language?

Jill_C

Community Expert

No, that's a standard word in English.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

G

Geisard

Known Participant

Hmm.. honestly might be as simple as not choosing the right subcategory.

Jill_C

Community Expert

If, by subcategory, you mean Landscapes, People, Food, etc. I'm quite sure that has nothing to do with reviewing algorithms. We have been told by Adobe multiple times that those categories are a hold-over from the Fotolia days and are essentially meaningless now. Not sure why they don't just eliminate them altogether.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

Abambo

Community Expert

The text comming with the refusal is stock text. that does not mean that your asset is AI or anything else, they say. It only means that most of these refusals have one of those reasons.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

T

Thomas_MorrisAutor

Known Participant

Also, when I read the rules regarding AI content, the images didn't violate any of them. What did I do or not do? I need help to do better, but I'm getting no guidance.

Abambo

Community Expert

Your images arn't generative AI, so those specific rules do not apply. No need to check them. Noncompliant assets are, when I look at my refusal history, assets, that are impossible to cure. They could have been rejected also under the quality issues.

From the manual:

Files may also be considered noncompliant due to watermarks, inappropriate or irrelevant keywords or titles, or questionable or defamatory content. Also, if you get a reminder to provide or resolve a problem with a release and you resubmit the file without addressing the issue, we’ll reject it as noncompliant.

Bold is mine, I think that should be the reason for your rejection.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

daniellei4510

Community Expert

The moderator may have selected the wrong reason for rejection. The first and third images especially have issues with shadows that are too deep. Always check your Histogram.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.

T

Thomas_MorrisAutor

Known Participant

Thank you. That's a quality issue. That's the kind of rejection feedback that I can work with.

However, I doubt that moderator(s) selected the same wrong reason for rejection 16 times in a row.

Abambo

Community Expert

Why not? May be that moderator issued a whole day those refusals.

If I would implement something like Adobe stock moderation, moderators would push 1 to 6 for a refusal. So a moderator choosing 4 instead of 1 a whole day long...

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Anmelden

Login über soziales Netzwerk

Willkommen

Login über soziales Netzwerk

Scanne Datei nach Viren

Diese Datei kann nicht heruntergeladen werden