Known Participant

Question

non-compliant images

Forum|Forum|2 years ago
February 24, 2024
4 replies
3134 views

I recently had 16 images rejected for being "non-compliant images". Possible reasons include:

-Non compliant use of another artist’s name.

- Undeclared Generative AI Content.

- Content not compliant with overall guidelines

None of those apply as far as I know.

They are photos. They are my photos. I didn't use another artist's name. I used no AI-generated content. What overall guidelines do they not comply with? I'll attach images and you can tell me what I need to do differently

[moderator detached from unrelated discussion]

Contributor critique

This topic has been closed for replies.

George_F

Community Expert

Keywords and titles are a good place to check for a non-compliance rejection. Making sure they are all in the same language and there aren't any copyrighted or trademarked terms in them.

George F, Photographer & Forum Volunteer

T

Thomas_MorrisAuthor

Known Participant

Ah! I'll recheck those to confirm. Question: If I use the word "shiitake" for a mushroom image, will that get flagged as a different language?

Jill_C

Community Expert

No, that's a standard word in English.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

G

Geisard

Known Participant

Hmm.. honestly might be as simple as not choosing the right subcategory.

Jill_C

Community Expert

If, by subcategory, you mean Landscapes, People, Food, etc. I'm quite sure that has nothing to do with reviewing algorithms. We have been told by Adobe multiple times that those categories are a hold-over from the Fotolia days and are essentially meaningless now. Not sure why they don't just eliminate them altogether.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

Abambo

Community Expert

The text comming with the refusal is stock text. that does not mean that your asset is AI or anything else, they say. It only means that most of these refusals have one of those reasons.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

T

Thomas_MorrisAuthor

Known Participant

Also, when I read the rules regarding AI content, the images didn't violate any of them. What did I do or not do? I need help to do better, but I'm getting no guidance.

daniellei4510

Community Expert

Thanks you. I'll see what I can do to improve the quality of the images and resubmit.

My main concern is that as I generate more images, I suddenly have to deal with an algorithm flagging my images as AI and require actions on my end to avoid rejection. I'm happy to change what I'm doing, but I want to make sure I know what change I need to make and when.

Quick question. If I used AI tools like noise reduction or sharpening, does that make it necessary to declare the image as having AI?

Quick question. If I used AI tools like noise reduction or sharpening, does that make it necessary to declare the image as having AI?

------------

By @Thomas_Morris

No. Those types of edits would not be considered AI.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.

daniellei4510

Community Expert

The moderator may have selected the wrong reason for rejection. The first and third images especially have issues with shadows that are too deep. Always check your Histogram.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.

T

Thomas_MorrisAuthor

Known Participant

Thank you. That's a quality issue. That's the kind of rejection feedback that I can work with.

However, I doubt that moderator(s) selected the same wrong reason for rejection 16 times in a row.

Abambo

Community Expert

Why not? May be that moderator issued a whole day those refusals.

If I would implement something like Adobe stock moderation, moderators would push 1 to 6 for a refusal. So a moderator choosing 4 instead of 1 a whole day long...

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Scanning file for viruses.

This file cannot be downloaded