Known Participant

Answered

Not a logical refusal

Forum|Forum|2 years ago
January 11, 2024
3 replies
2953 views

I have one conclusion. I think they are rejecting my images randomly. 10-15 pass, 10-15 do not pass, uploaded one after the other. Then where it stopped, rejection again, then where it stopped, acceptance continues and so on in continuity.

Is there any way to request a re-examination?

Contributors

This topic has been closed for replies.

Correct answer Abambo

As for the image you DID post, I'd first of all remove the text. Let the buy add what they prefer.

By @daniellei4510

Especially as the text is awfully placed (that's composition, which is a “quality issue”), and it exposes aliasing (which is also a “quality issue”). You can compare the quality with my “V” and yours (seen at 100%).

Your “background image” exposes a lot of noise.

Looking at the asset, I'm sure that the refusal is correct. If the images that passed are at the same quality level, I would strongly suspect that the moderators are randomly accepting assets.

Jill_C

Community Expert

Since all assets are reviewed by human moderators, there is definitely some variability and subjectivity involved in the review process; however, I don't believe that rejections are random. As noted by others here, Adobe prefers that you NOT include any text in your images. That's a simple thing that a Buyer with even very rudimentary Photoshop skills can do themselves. And, of course, including such text in English limits your market.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

L

London346958332gex

Known Participant

To refute the random nature of image rejection, you need to be able to guess which image is accepted and which is not.
Can you do this?

Abambo

Community Expert

To refute the random nature of image rejection, you need to be able to guess which image is accepted and which is not.
Can you do this?

By @London346958332gex

Image acceptance is kind of random, since the arrival of generative AI. So, indeed, I am able to tell you why an asset should get refused. It's not because you have got awful assets accepted that all of your awful assets need to get accepted. That's all.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Abambo

Community Expert

Is there any way to request a re-examination?

By @Danijela Zrenjanin

Resubmit. If you do that too often without corrections, your account could be blocked.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

daniellei4510

Community Expert

No, the decision of the moderators is final, but you can edit rejections and re-submit. If you are having difficulty finding the reason an image was rejected, post it here and we'll have a look.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.

daniellei4510

Community Expert

As for the image you DID post, I'd first of all remove the text. Let the buy add what they prefer.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.

L

London346958332gex

Known Participant

But, for example: The fact that no one here could determine which work was accepted and which was not is a fact! A fact that once again confirms the chaotic nature of deviations. Or it confirms that you are completely unaware of the reasons for the deviation!
Or is there some other option?

And the fact that you can find some errors in any work cannot refute the assumptions of chaos, because you are just as likely to find errors in even accepted work!

By @London346958332gex

If work with errors in is accepted, it is accepted by error. That happens in high numbers since the advent of generative AI. If the assets you present here have errors, we will show them to you. We do not do a guesswork whether the asset has been accepted by error or not. But you know that by now.

I repeat: very little of the presented assets here do not expose easily to detect faults. It's rare that a refused asset does not expose a fault that is detectable in the first 10 seconds of opening and examining the asset.

You want to defend the work of the moderators so much that you are already contradicting yourself.
Because it is impossible to protect the work of moderators in this case.
You yourself say that they are making a mistake in accepting the job.
But when they suggest that the moderator made a mistake by rejecting the work, you immediately begin to accuse them of conspiracy theories!
But tell me, why is your assumption that the moderator made a mistake by accepting bad work not a conspiracy theory?
This is a contradiction bro, such contradictions exist when they hide something, deceive and bend one line.
But I think I understand, you are obligated to do this by Adobe rules.
In theory, this problem should be brought to the attention of Adobe, and not preserved by all means.
But you don’t want Adobe to get better, as I understand it.

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Scanning file for viruses.

This file cannot be downloaded