All 3 images suffer from bad focus and poor dynamic range - dark areas and blown-out highlights. If they had not been rejected for technical reasons, they probably would have been rejected for aesthetic appeal, because a snapshot of leaves against a cluttered background just isn't very saleable.
they probably would have been rejected for aesthetic appeal, because a snapshot of leaves against a cluttered background just isn't very saleable.
Not sure on that. They give a nice background if technically correct!
Besides that the pictures are not sharp, your phone introduces some really bad small sensor related artefacts:
Look at your pictures at 100% and 200% to detect faults and artefacts.
If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
OkThank you so much for your comment😊
Mara Mora Rueda
[Moderator deleted private information. Please do not post private information like e-mails and phone numbers]