Skip to main content
This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Ricky336

Hello,

If you used filters in this shot - don't. Keep the photo in normal colours. Buyers can add their own stylistic filters.

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.ug.html

 

4 replies

Ricky336
Community Expert
Ricky336Community ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
March 23, 2022

Hello,

If you used filters in this shot - don't. Keep the photo in normal colours. Buyers can add their own stylistic filters.

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.ug.html

 

    S
    Sergio23701002y9ogAuthor
    Participant
    March 23, 2022

    I agree, thank you for replying.  Just trying to become a better photographer 🙂 

    Abambo
    Community Expert
    AbamboCommunity Expert
    Community Expert
    March 23, 2022

    Filters don't make you a better photographer. Filters will be applied by the buyer if he or she has a need for them.

     

    If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
    Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
    See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
    and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

    ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
    Marianne-Deiters
    Marianne-Deiters
    Participating Frequently
    March 23, 2022

    It looks like you have done a color toning and other that you better avoid.

      S
      Sergio23701002y9ogAuthor
      Participant
      March 23, 2022

      Thank you it makes sense! 

      jacquelingphoto2017
      Community Expert
      jacquelingphoto2017Community Expert
      Community Expert
      March 23, 2022

      Hi @Sergio23701002y9og ,

      Also it is underexposed and has too much of a shallow depth of field.

      Best wishes

      Jacquelin

        S
        Sergio23701002y9ogAuthor
        Participant
        March 23, 2022

        Thank you Jacquelin, 

        I appreciate your reply.  Your help is greatly appreciated. 

         

        One question:

        Isnt shallow depth of field acceptable in nature shoots?

         

         

        Abambo
        Community Expert
        AbamboCommunity Expert
        Community Expert
        March 23, 2022
        quote

         

        One question:

        Isnt shallow depth of field acceptable in nature shoots?

         

        By @Sergio23701002y9og

        Yes, it is. The DOF is probably not the refusal cause if your subject is in focus.

        ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
        Jill_C
        Community Expert
        Jill_CCommunity Expert
        Community Expert
        March 22, 2022

        The white balance is off, and the animals' hair has an over-sharpened spiky look.

        Jill C., Forum Volunteer
          Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
          Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices