Please help me understand the quality issues that led to this image being rejected.

I didn't quite understand, what happens if Adobe decides that my contributions get more costly than they are worth? And I want to make it clear that I do fix a lot of issues using photoshop - since I am a new seller, I try to be extra cautious. But also since I am new, I need to find the right balance of quality and quantity as well as manage my time. In this instance I disregarded some rendering issues because I see top sellers with similar issues in their images as well, leading me to believe these were okay for AI generations. I'm glad I posted here because even if I fixed the issues that were visible to me, my image would still be rejected because a number of other flaws were pointed out.

By @riasathr93866260

Don't look at top sellers with assets that have issues. One day, they are a top seller, next day they are banned, because Adobe got too much complaints from those top sales. No one knows the threshold, but we had contributors here who complained that they were a top seller and they got banned quite after that. 

You really need to check your assets at 100%. If you see issues, correct them. If you can't correct them, do not submit. The more complex your generative AI picture is, the more issues will it have.

Not all assets with issues get refused. We have no clue why that is, but we assume that some moderators are better than others in detecting issues. So, sometimes, resubmitting an asset without modifications may get it passed, but if the issues stay, a buyer will complain. If a lot of buyers complain, you are getting expensive... 

I have deleted assets, that should have been refused (as I'm a photographer, the issues were different: IP violations). There is no need to do money with assets that will get you in trouble at a later stage.