Property release form buildings

[Marko Subotin]

The building is easily identifiable by anyone from my town. It is older than 120 years, it's not private property, but I don't want some lawyer to come knocking on my door 5 years from now.
I've read all the pages from the Adobe Help and I am not still 100% sure, can anyone clarify this?
Thanks

[Abambo]

I will move this to the contributor forum.

So, what is your question? If your question is, "Do I need a property release?", the answer may be "yes" and it would be wise to provide one. You will at least have a need to edit out the following elements:

Without making a legal advice: If you took this picture from a public POV, and the building is indeed more than 120 years old, you will need no property release. In addition, the girl on skaters is the main subject, and I suppose that you have a model release for her. The moderators may see this differently, and then you will need to prove your case.

[Marko Subotin]

Ok, there should be a button to delete a post, because I've realized my mistake and made a new one over there.
I know about the elements in the background. the image is not finished yet, I am talking just about the building in the background. 
Thanks Abambo

[Abambo]

Ok, there should be a button to delete a post

By @Marko Subotin

That's no problem, but I scanned first the stock forum… 😉 So, I answered there, and I decided to lock your other post. This is daily work for (forum) moderators. You're welcome.

As for the building and the lawyer coming after you, who would that be? It will really depend on your local laws if there is a chance that a lawyer (for the building owner) would file a case. In Germany, you have "Panoramafreiheit". You wouldn't be attacked for this picture. But as I said, (stock) moderators could see this differently and could ask for a property release. If possible, submit one.

[Test Screen Name]

A small note: "private property" or "public propery" does not affect Adobe's rules or moderators.

[RALPH_L]

It is not quiet that easy. The building, as photographed, is identifiable and you obviously were not on the public sidewalk.

I assume you were on the property associated with the building. This is still considered private property. Even if open to the public. I would crop down too show less. Your photo is, in my opinion, not an optimal composition. There is too much foreground, too much empty space, the horizontal lines are slanted and it does not follow the rule of thirds. The skater is out of focus.

[Jill_C]

You could easily edit this image to make the building less identifiable, which would also address some of the inherent technical issues including leaning verticals, blurry foreground and underexposed shadows. I'm fairly certain that the portion of the building shown in the example I've included would not require a property release. 

[Nancy OShea · Accepted solution]

Signs and logos on shops and vehicles are a problem.

Architecture in the background is not usually a problem. 

The model is your main subject, not the building. 

Crop & straighten the image before submitting.