70
Replies
As for the windows. They are by AI image generations standard "perfect".
By @Svetlana28639737zwpi
That may not be good enough.
As for the windows. They are by AI image generations standard "perfect".
By @Svetlana28639737zwpi
Buyers could expect better.
This is why I've been reviewing images at 300% before submitting them. Note the difference in grain where it ends and abruptly becomes smooth. This would be rejected if a strict moderator got hold of it (as some in the past have). I didn't check to see if this happened during the initial rendering or during upscaling but it did happen and I've added grain locally and hopefully will pass.
,
Just accept the fact that people noticed that algoritam took over the review process and that its making mistakes.
By @Svetlana28639737zwpi
Algorithms don't make errors, they have bugs. Adobe confirms that checking is done by humans. And that is the reason for the delays. With algorithms, you would just need to add computing power and the delays would be gone.
You are talking about upscaled images that would never in a milion years pass a stock industry standard review.
Adobe is fully avare of that.
There is no AI generator available, to civilians, that produce images that can pass a regular (human) stock review.
By @Svetlana28639737zwpi
That is the reason you need to check your generative AI assets, and you need to correct the errors. There are too many bad assets in the database, and the aim of stock is not to throw in some scrap images and see if customers complain. A complaining customer has spent hours researching the correct asset, modelling a work, submitting that to their customer, getting approval, licensing and sending the final design to the printer. If after all that work, the buyer sees that the quality is not good enough, they have to go back to the client with alternative designs. That's an impossible situation. That is what Adobe is fully aware of.
As for the "customer experience".
Stock buyers have eyes. There is even zoom options.
Buying stock images is the definition of "what you see is what you get".
If you are buying a vissual asset to use in your work. Well, the whole point is in visual inspection to see if it will fit your needs.
You will always have "Caren" buyers. But they will complain even when they buy a perfect photo shot on phase camera.
By @Svetlana28639737zwpi
I see that you never worked on projects where you selected stock assets. As a customer, I can expect that the assets that get offered to me are perfect. It's not my job to check them for errors. And there is no zoom function. Before I licence, I get a size reduced preview.
BTW: alone the search for assets costs money, so if I find tons of irrelevant assets, I lose money, just by sorting out the bad assets.
Stock buyers have eyes. There is even zoom options.
Buying stock images is the definition of "what you see is what you get".
If you are buying a vissual asset to use in your work. Well, the whole point is in visual inspection to see if it will fit your needs.
You will always have "Caren" buyers. But they will complain even when they buy a perfect photo shot on phase camera.
By @Svetlana28639737zwpiI see that you never worked on projects where you selected stock assets. As a customer, I can expect that the assets that get offered to me are perfect. It's not my job to check them for errors. And there is no zoom function. Before I licence, I get a size reduced preview.
BTW: alone the search for assets costs money, so if I find tons of irrelevant assets, I lose money, just by sorting out the bad assets.
By @Abambo
@AbamboFrom your comment i see that you simply don't understand the current state of ai image technology.
If you did, you would know that there is not a single AI image from maybe millions approwed that is perfect. They all have flaws, some more some less.
Are you really expecting to get perfect assets from a microstock agency? Not limited to ai images? Well, that's a bit of a stretch.
Or did you tought that there is a "tick box" to select or deselect ai images in search only for potential legal reasons? That the adobe is notifying the buyers about?
Also. You not knowing about the "preview crop" together with the scale slider. Tells me that you don't really have experience on the adobe stock web page.
So my conclusion of you is in form of a question.
What does that violet badge with white star on your profile menas? Together with that "Community Expert" text.
If you did, you would know that there is not a single AI image from maybe millions approwed that is perfect. They all have flaws, some more some less.
If they have flaws, you need to correct them. The millions approved are problematic, as many are really unusable. Customers complain! When customers complain hard enough, then Adobe needs to do something. They are doing something. They refuse assets that are not good enough. That is the reason your assets get refused. End of discussion.
Are you really expecting to get perfect assets from a microstock agency? Not limited to ai images? Well, that's a bit of a stretch.
By @Svetlana28639737zwpi
As a customer to stock, I can expect that the images are good enough for being used. That means that they should follow the same quality standards as my pictures. Generative AI or not. If you want to submit low-quality assets, you should look for a different service. The advantage of Adobe stock against other stock vendors was always the good quality (even that I've also seen bad quality images here).
EG: A customer would like to license a picture to print as a backdrop in her kitchen. She licences an asset. The asset gets refused by the printer because of a low resolution. I get hired to correct that. I look at the asset, and see that it has been badly edited. Blown up at full print size, that would have been awful. It should never have been added here. We tried up to four assets, all exposing problems. The customer lost several $100 of invest for nothing.
Stock images need to be correct. If you have artefacts in your pictures, bad lanterns growing out of the trees, the asset should get refused. There are too many bad assets in the database. Do not add a couple of yours.
In addition, I am aware of the challenges that generative AI presents. The customer is just not in the mood to buy your bad artwork!
AdChoices
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}