Skip to main content
F
Fabian3143712350w4
Participant
August 1, 2023
Answered

Query: image quality

  • August 1, 2023
  • 3 replies
  • 1470 views

I need your guidance with the following photos, please. They are being rejected with this message:

Common problems that can affect the technical quality of the images include exposure issues, blur, excessive filtering or artifacts/noise.

Although I did edit the first photos a bit, after receiving this same response before, I decided to upload the original photos, but they also tell me the same thing. Could you give me a comparison or recomendation? Thank you.

 
 

 

 

    This topic has been closed for replies.
    Correct answer Jill_C

    Flowers for life (2).jpg - Zoom in beyond 100% and you'll see that it lacks sharp focus.

    Flowers for life (3).jpg - Underexposed and depth of field is too shallow.

    Flowers for life (9).jpg - Also not sharp, and not well composed

    Flowers for life (10).jpg - same as above

     

    Adobe Stock now has >29.5 million floral images, and the chance that one of yours would ever be sold is close to zero. While shooting and editing flower images can be fun and good practice for your skills, I wouldn't bother uploading them to Adobe Stock. 

     

    3 replies

    RALPH_L
    Community Expert
    RALPH_LCommunity Expert
    Community Expert
    August 2, 2023

    I just looked at number 10. Focus is bad.

    Jill_C
    Community Expert
    Jill_CCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
    Community Expert
    August 1, 2023

    Flowers for life (2).jpg - Zoom in beyond 100% and you'll see that it lacks sharp focus.

    Flowers for life (3).jpg - Underexposed and depth of field is too shallow.

    Flowers for life (9).jpg - Also not sharp, and not well composed

    Flowers for life (10).jpg - same as above

     

    Adobe Stock now has >29.5 million floral images, and the chance that one of yours would ever be sold is close to zero. While shooting and editing flower images can be fun and good practice for your skills, I wouldn't bother uploading them to Adobe Stock. 

     

    Jill C., Forum Volunteer
    F
    Fabian3143712350w4Author
    Participant
    August 1, 2023

    thanks!!! 👍

     

    daniellei4510
    Community Expert
    daniellei4510Community Expert
    Community Expert
    August 1, 2023

    Never mind the Quality Issues notice. There are millions of flower images in the database already and unless you are submitting images that are EXTREMELY unique and creative, few if any will make them past the moderators.

    Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
      F
      Fabian3143712350w4Author
      Participant
      August 1, 2023

      I understand, but couldn’t they tell me that directly or something like “be more innovative”? The previous photos that they rejected were of buildings and the city where I live, and on all the websites where I was, they accepted me (not all the photos obviously, but most of them).

      What can you recommend me to be more innovative?

      daniellei4510
      Community Expert
      daniellei4510Community Expert
      Community Expert
      August 1, 2023

      They moderate thousands of images per day and do not have the time to provide any helpful information besides a copperplate response. If they did, it would take much longer than the two month average waiting time for images to be reviewed and accepted/rejected. Getting more detailed feedback is what this forum is for. 😉

      Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
      Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
      Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices