Photo improvement [Branched to new topic]

[Tombhoy]

just got started, new guy on the block,I would like help is that ok my good friends.!!

my kindest regards

Tombhoy!

[Nancy OShea]

[Moderator branched & moved to new topic.]

@Tombhoy,
What did you just get started with?  Please be more specific.

This space is for Stock Contributors who have photography experience.  If you're not an experienced photographer, start by enrolling in some courses and join a photography club.   Without knowing more about your skills, equipment and exactly what you need help with, it's impossible to make other suggestions.

[Tombhoy]

my wonderful friends just started i will get better with your help,rome was not build in a day.

  so i will send nice photo up and u retake it so i can see what to do.

                                                    my kindest regards to u all

                                                                       Tombhoy.

[Nancy OShea]

so i will send nice photo up and u retake it so i can see what to do.

By @Tombhoy

============

NO.  That's not how it works here. 

Take some photography courses. 

We can't teach you photography.

Read the Stock Contributor User Guide.  Adobe Stock customers expect the highest visual and technical quality for use in commercial projects.

• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustr...
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/how-to/tips-stock-image-acceptance.html

[Tombhoy]

Ok i see.I have snagit hmm,well i will try to improve it.

            look at this one please!

[Nancy OShea · Accepted solution]

Did you submit this image to Stock? 

What was the rejection reason Adobe Stock gave you?

Stock will most likely refuse this for property reasons.  Objects inside museums and private homes are protected. You need written permission to sell this image commercially.

Also the technical quality is very poor.  The image contains noise and a lot of chromatic aberation (purple halos around objects).

What kind of camera and light source did you use?

[Jill_C · Accepted solution]

The portrait image is blurry, hazy and has blown highlights; but since it someone else's artwork, it would certainly be rejected on IP grounds. The castle interior is also poorly exposed, blurry, hazy, and has blown highlights and chromatic aberration. These types of unedited snapshots are not suitable for Stock.

[Tombhoy]

my name is Tombhoy and i hope i can do well to support ppl on Adobe!!!

                                               thank you.!!

[Nancy OShea · Accepted solution]

This is not Stock worthy for the same reasons mentioned above.  Intelectual property, poor visual and technical quality.

These might be fine for sharing with friends & family on social media but they are not commercial quality for selling on Stock websites.

Bye and good luck.

[Tombhoy]

Karena topper,but my palace is worth more haha.I would like to be like you tho, but snagit have to do better.

                                               I will send you some photos to see if you can sort them.!!

                                                              Tombhoy.