Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The edges aren't clean and he has too many fingers!
Hi,
it seems that the Picture/Illustration is way to unsharp, blurry lines, the Fingers already mentioned, there are no eyes and not many details in the Illustration. Maybe look for a technically slightly higher Image quality. Hope that helps.
Badly reproduced anatomy (screenshots at 100%):
The quality of the picture, even without the above-mentioned anatomical miracles, is terrible, full of artefacts. It looks to me that you upscaled a bad JPEG image to the given size.
Whatever you intended to do, I strongly recommend, you read the quality requirement, before submitting again.
If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
This appears to be another example of artificially generated artwork gone wrong.
HINT: Before submitting, your images must be rendered in high quality upscales which usually costs more for the additional bandwidth and server time. In post-editing, examine images at 100-300% magnification. Count fingers & toes. Look at details -- hands, arms, eyes & legs. Artificial Intelligence is stupid about details. Fix all problems, if you can, in post-editing or don't submit.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The edges aren't clean and he has too many fingers!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thank you!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi,
it seems that the Picture/Illustration is way to unsharp, blurry lines, the Fingers already mentioned, there are no eyes and not many details in the Illustration. Maybe look for a technically slightly higher Image quality. Hope that helps.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thank you!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Badly reproduced anatomy (screenshots at 100%):
The quality of the picture, even without the above-mentioned anatomical miracles, is terrible, full of artefacts. It looks to me that you upscaled a bad JPEG image to the given size.
Whatever you intended to do, I strongly recommend, you read the quality requirement, before submitting again.
If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
And especially look also into the AI-generated images requirement: announcing-the-adobe-stock-policy-on-generative-ai-content
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thank you! You are right, I will try to correct these mistakes.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
You're welcome. I suggest, before submitting to stock, you check your images thoroughly. You will save you and the moderators time, ven that in this case, the refusal was decided on the spot. My analysis was some work, but if you look at the image, you immediatly see that it is wrong.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
This appears to be another example of artificially generated artwork gone wrong.
HINT: Before submitting, your images must be rendered in high quality upscales which usually costs more for the additional bandwidth and server time. In post-editing, examine images at 100-300% magnification. Count fingers & toes. Look at details -- hands, arms, eyes & legs. Artificial Intelligence is stupid about details. Fix all problems, if you can, in post-editing or don't submit.