Refused for technical reasons.

Forum|Forum|2 years ago
April 27, 2023
3 replies
942 views

This topic has been closed for replies.

Correct answer Ricky336

Hello,

I don't think it is because of the highlights or saturation. My opinion is because of the artifacts that can be seen if you zoom in a bit around some highlight areas and the trees on the horizon.

This could be a problem.

Abambo

Community Expert

You did not post the original picture, so it's not easy, but I think that @Ricky336 is right. In addition, you have in your histogram some blacks and whites missing. There may also be a light noise problem.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

T

Tampere PhotographyAuthor

Participating Frequently

It is from original picture i cant fit full size in 10 mb restriction. There is no noise besides native iso160 specially on xtrans sensor what doesnt do mutch color noise. Whites missing ? Only problem is what ricky pointed out, and its fixed no need to search else for sake of finding somethhing there is not 🙂

Abambo

Community Expert

Correct one from previous

Blacks on the left, whites on the right, are missing.

As for the file size, you should post here the file as submitted. Especially, when you downsize the file, as you did, artefacts can't be correctly evaluated. Noise can't be evaluated. Chromatic aberration can't be evaluated. If artefacts are visible, then they are highly disturbing on the original file.

What can be evaluated is the exposure.

You will see if it gets accepted. But even when it gets accepted, that does not mean that the something isn't. It just means that it was not strong enough of a problem to motivate the moderator to refuse again.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Ricky336

Correct answer

Community Expert

Hello,

I don't think it is because of the highlights or saturation. My opinion is because of the artifacts that can be seen if you zoom in a bit around some highlight areas and the trees on the horizon.

This could be a problem.