Skip to main content
Participant
December 30, 2020
Question

Rejected Photo with technical issue - which mistakes are serious?

  • December 30, 2020
  • 1 reply
  • 328 views

There are several points in the "Technical FAQ" which may meet my photo, but I really don't know which of them leaded to rejection. I hope, somebody can tell me more.
I will describe the possible points:
1. I used my drone "Mavic 2 Zoom". Perhaps drone cameras are not good enough because of poor lenses.
2. I took videos instead of photos and extracted this picture from a video. Perhaps too bad resolution and compression.
3. The horizon was not horizontal. For better quality (IMHO) I resized the picture to 400%, turned it by 1°, cut the triangles off and resized the result back to the original size 3840x2160 which means increasing the original resolution by about 3,3%.
4. I separated the sky and increased the contrast of the landscape three times a little bit, each time more and more concentrated to the horizon.
5. To make more details visible in the dark areas, I increased gamma and adjusted contrast and brightness.
6. I increased the contrast of the separated sky.
7. To meet the taste of most people (IMHO), I increased the saturation of the whole picture a little bit.
OK - which point was wrong and which point was acceptable?
left picture: original - right picture: final result (rejected)

This topic has been closed for replies.

1 reply

Ricky336
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 30, 2020

There are compression artifacts:

It is noticeable when you zoom in.

Paul5FF3Author
Participant
December 31, 2020

Sorry ricky,

if I think about this issue - is this really a serious problem? If somebody prints this photo on a whole "letter" or "A4" sheet, nobody will see those artefacts. It could be left to the future customer if this photo meets his requirements.
I made a quick attempt to blurr only the water (see below). Is this an advance?

Legend
December 31, 2020

No. Your photos must be perfect. If a customer finds a poor quality picture, Adobe's reputation suffers. Every picture must be as good as a professional photographer could make it in ideal conditions with the best equipment. The customer makes no allowance for difficulty or rarity. It must be suitable for a multimillion dollar advertising campaign.