Skip to main content
Participant
April 26, 2022
Answered

Rejected Photographs

  • April 26, 2022
  • 3 replies
  • 772 views

Several of my Photographs were rejected on technical issues. 

I would like to know what went wrong so that I can correct myself in future

 

 

Regards

 

S R Ganguly

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Abambo

The tiger has been refused for technical issues, and that is completely correct, as the picture does show countless artefacts, no detail, and has a fancy filter applied. The moderator had an easy job on the 2 pictures, as all 2 get a refusal at first sight. No need to dig in the details.

 

The panda is in addition oversaturated. As of the nature of the Panda handling, I'm confident, that there is also IP protection involved.

3 replies

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
April 27, 2022

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
April 26, 2022

1) The panda is not sharp and the white fur is blown out. Vignettes are not permitted on submissions.

2) "Tiger" seems to be the main subject of this artwork according to the title of the file, but it isn't clear from the art itself that it's a tiger... Adobe Stock seeks photographs or illustrations that have commerical appeal, and the Moderator apparently felt that this digital art has no commercial appeal. 

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
Abambo
Community Expert
AbamboCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
April 27, 2022

The tiger has been refused for technical issues, and that is completely correct, as the picture does show countless artefacts, no detail, and has a fancy filter applied. The moderator had an easy job on the 2 pictures, as all 2 get a refusal at first sight. No need to dig in the details.

 

The panda is in addition oversaturated. As of the nature of the Panda handling, I'm confident, that there is also IP protection involved.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
RALPH_L
Community Expert
Community Expert
April 26, 2022

Same answer as on your previous post. Also, you mmay need a propertry release for the zoo animals.

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
April 27, 2022
quote

Same answer as on your previous post. Also, you mmay need a propertry release for the zoo animals.


By @RALPH_L

The “previous post”, Ralph is referring to, may be found here: https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock-contributors-discussions/rejected-photographs/m-p/12906175#M42679

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer