Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
  • 한국 커뮤니티
0

Rejected photos

New Here ,
Sep 05, 2025 Sep 05, 2025

Hi, I uploaded some of my photos, but most of them got rejected, and i don't know the reason for it. Can you please help me improve my pictures to get more approvals? I attach some of them here.

TOPICS
Contributor critique
582
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 5 Correct answers

Community Expert , Sep 05, 2025 Sep 05, 2025

There are nearly 71,500,000 flower images on Adobe Stock. They are very difficult to get accepted, and if accepted, they would be lost in the search results. 9086 is underexposed. I like 5944, but black and white assets, while they do at times get accepted, buyers prefer color. Depth-of-field is an issue with a number of these, like 8203, which is too closely cropped as well.

Translate
Community Expert , Sep 05, 2025 Sep 05, 2025

IMG_9086.JPG - very noisy 

IMG_6700.JPG - DOF is too shallow, leaving much of the bloom out of focus 

IMG_6718.JPG - again DIF too shallow, part if the bud are not sharply focused

IMG_6718.JPG - not well composed, you've cut off petals on the left side

 

Adobe already has many millions of similar flower images. I wouldn't bother submitting flowers unless you've found some rare under-represented species.

 

 

 

 

 

Translate
Community Expert , Sep 05, 2025 Sep 05, 2025

Nighttime shots are very challenging, even for experts.  To get good results requires experience and proper equipment.

It's easier to shoot in daylight. 

 

 

 

 

Translate
Community Expert , Sep 06, 2025 Sep 06, 2025

Hello,

I think the composition could be better in this photo:

Ricky336_0-1757176771430.png

Not so good here.

There are indeed a lot of flower photos. It's been done to death.

 

Translate
Community Expert , Sep 06, 2025 Sep 06, 2025

8229 is overexposed (has no blacks) and is not sharp. The exposure can be corrected in post, the sharpness is a fatal issue. 

Translate
Community Expert ,
Sep 05, 2025 Sep 05, 2025

There are nearly 71,500,000 flower images on Adobe Stock. They are very difficult to get accepted, and if accepted, they would be lost in the search results. 9086 is underexposed. I like 5944, but black and white assets, while they do at times get accepted, buyers prefer color. Depth-of-field is an issue with a number of these, like 8203, which is too closely cropped as well.


Forum Volunteer | One thing I've learned from these forums is how to spell algorithm.
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Sep 05, 2025 Sep 05, 2025

Thank you, i'll keep in mind these!

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 05, 2025 Sep 05, 2025

IMG_9086.JPG - very noisy 

IMG_6700.JPG - DOF is too shallow, leaving much of the bloom out of focus 

IMG_6718.JPG - again DIF too shallow, part if the bud are not sharply focused

IMG_6718.JPG - not well composed, you've cut off petals on the left side

 

Adobe already has many millions of similar flower images. I wouldn't bother submitting flowers unless you've found some rare under-represented species.

 

 

 

 

 

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Sep 05, 2025 Sep 05, 2025

Thanks for the advices, I'll look out for these, mostly the DOF, i see, it's a common mistake for now.

 

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 05, 2025 Sep 05, 2025

Nighttime shots are very challenging, even for experts.  To get good results requires experience and proper equipment.

It's easier to shoot in daylight. 

 

 

 

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User, Community Expert & Moderator
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Sep 06, 2025 Sep 06, 2025

Yeah, I see now, thanks. For now I'll stick with daylight to avoid high ISO and nise. 

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 06, 2025 Sep 06, 2025

A tripod and long exposures are helping with nighttime shots. As Nancy says, the ask for experience, but the results can be stunning. High ISO increases noise in a picture. If you can't compensate for that noise in post, it is indeed an issue for Adobe stock.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Sep 07, 2025 Sep 07, 2025

Thanks for the tips! Rn I don't have a tripod, but with time, I will surely get one for those amazing long exposure shots! For now, I stick with handheld. 

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 07, 2025 Sep 07, 2025

Tripods are essential for nightshots. You can also use a table or a wall or something else, to stabalize your camera. Bur a tripod is the most versatile and it's not that expensive.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 07, 2025 Sep 07, 2025
LATEST

I found a nice used tripod at my camera store for almost nothing. Also inquire at pawn shops, and 2nd hand/thrift stores.

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User, Community Expert & Moderator
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 06, 2025 Sep 06, 2025

Hello,

I think the composition could be better in this photo:

Ricky336_0-1757176771430.png

Not so good here.

There are indeed a lot of flower photos. It's been done to death.

 

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Sep 06, 2025 Sep 06, 2025

I see, thanks, I'll look for more unique themes!

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 06, 2025 Sep 06, 2025

8229 is overexposed (has no blacks) and is not sharp. The exposure can be corrected in post, the sharpness is a fatal issue. 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Sep 07, 2025 Sep 07, 2025

I used a close up filter for that pic, I think that is the problem, because it's a pretty cheap one. Defenetly can cause lack of sharpness, when paired with my kit objective. 

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 07, 2025 Sep 07, 2025

You did use a hardware filter for your lens? So yo basically converted with this your lens, which is not a macro lens into a macro lens?

Anyhow: If an asset is not sharp when viewed at 100%, do not submit. Sharpness is a required property, and easy to check.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines