Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi, I uploaded some of my photos, but most of them got rejected, and i don't know the reason for it. Can you please help me improve my pictures to get more approvals? I attach some of them here.
There are nearly 71,500,000 flower images on Adobe Stock. They are very difficult to get accepted, and if accepted, they would be lost in the search results. 9086 is underexposed. I like 5944, but black and white assets, while they do at times get accepted, buyers prefer color. Depth-of-field is an issue with a number of these, like 8203, which is too closely cropped as well.
IMG_9086.JPG - very noisy
IMG_6700.JPG - DOF is too shallow, leaving much of the bloom out of focus
IMG_6718.JPG - again DIF too shallow, part if the bud are not sharply focused
IMG_6718.JPG - not well composed, you've cut off petals on the left side
Adobe already has many millions of similar flower images. I wouldn't bother submitting flowers unless you've found some rare under-represented species.
Nighttime shots are very challenging, even for experts. To get good results requires experience and proper equipment.
It's easier to shoot in daylight.
Hello,
I think the composition could be better in this photo:
Not so good here.
There are indeed a lot of flower photos. It's been done to death.
8229 is overexposed (has no blacks) and is not sharp. The exposure can be corrected in post, the sharpness is a fatal issue.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
There are nearly 71,500,000 flower images on Adobe Stock. They are very difficult to get accepted, and if accepted, they would be lost in the search results. 9086 is underexposed. I like 5944, but black and white assets, while they do at times get accepted, buyers prefer color. Depth-of-field is an issue with a number of these, like 8203, which is too closely cropped as well.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thank you, i'll keep in mind these!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
IMG_9086.JPG - very noisy
IMG_6700.JPG - DOF is too shallow, leaving much of the bloom out of focus
IMG_6718.JPG - again DIF too shallow, part if the bud are not sharply focused
IMG_6718.JPG - not well composed, you've cut off petals on the left side
Adobe already has many millions of similar flower images. I wouldn't bother submitting flowers unless you've found some rare under-represented species.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thanks for the advices, I'll look out for these, mostly the DOF, i see, it's a common mistake for now.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Nighttime shots are very challenging, even for experts. To get good results requires experience and proper equipment.
It's easier to shoot in daylight.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Yeah, I see now, thanks. For now I'll stick with daylight to avoid high ISO and nise.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
A tripod and long exposures are helping with nighttime shots. As Nancy says, the ask for experience, but the results can be stunning. High ISO increases noise in a picture. If you can't compensate for that noise in post, it is indeed an issue for Adobe stock.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thanks for the tips! Rn I don't have a tripod, but with time, I will surely get one for those amazing long exposure shots! For now, I stick with handheld.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Tripods are essential for nightshots. You can also use a table or a wall or something else, to stabalize your camera. Bur a tripod is the most versatile and it's not that expensive.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I found a nice used tripod at my camera store for almost nothing. Also inquire at pawn shops, and 2nd hand/thrift stores.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hello,
I think the composition could be better in this photo:
Not so good here.
There are indeed a lot of flower photos. It's been done to death.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I see, thanks, I'll look for more unique themes!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
8229 is overexposed (has no blacks) and is not sharp. The exposure can be corrected in post, the sharpness is a fatal issue.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I used a close up filter for that pic, I think that is the problem, because it's a pretty cheap one. Defenetly can cause lack of sharpness, when paired with my kit objective.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
You did use a hardware filter for your lens? So yo basically converted with this your lens, which is not a macro lens into a macro lens?
Anyhow: If an asset is not sharp when viewed at 100%, do not submit. Sharpness is a required property, and easy to check.
Find more inspiration, events, and resources on the new Adobe Community
Explore Now