Quitter
  • Communauté internationale
    • Langue:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
  • 한국 커뮤니티

Rejected photos

Nouveau ici ,
Sep 05, 2025 Sep 05, 2025

Hi, I uploaded some of my photos, but most of them got rejected, and i don't know the reason for it. Can you please help me improve my pictures to get more approvals? I attach some of them here.

SUJETS
Critique des contributeurs
770
Traduire
Signaler
Directives de la communauté
Restez bienveillant et courtois, ne vous attribuez pas la paternité des créations d’autrui et assurez-vous de l’absence de doublons avant de poster du contenu. En savoir plus
community guidelines

correct answers 5 bonnes réponses

Community Expert , Sep 05, 2025 Sep 05, 2025

There are nearly 71,500,000 flower images on Adobe Stock. They are very difficult to get accepted, and if accepted, they would be lost in the search results. 9086 is underexposed. I like 5944, but black and white assets, while they do at times get accepted, buyers prefer color. Depth-of-field is an issue with a number of these, like 8203, which is too closely cropped as well.

Traduire
Community Expert , Sep 05, 2025 Sep 05, 2025

IMG_9086.JPG - very noisy 

IMG_6700.JPG - DOF is too shallow, leaving much of the bloom out of focus 

IMG_6718.JPG - again DIF too shallow, part if the bud are not sharply focused

IMG_6718.JPG - not well composed, you've cut off petals on the left side

 

Adobe already has many millions of similar flower images. I wouldn't bother submitting flowers unless you've found some rare under-represented species.

 

 

 

 

 

Traduire
Community Expert , Sep 05, 2025 Sep 05, 2025

Nighttime shots are very challenging, even for experts.  To get good results requires experience and proper equipment.

It's easier to shoot in daylight. 

 

 

 

 

Traduire
Community Expert , Sep 06, 2025 Sep 06, 2025

Hello,

I think the composition could be better in this photo:

Ricky336_0-1757176771430.png

Not so good here.

There are indeed a lot of flower photos. It's been done to death.

 

Traduire
Community Expert , Sep 06, 2025 Sep 06, 2025

8229 is overexposed (has no blacks) and is not sharp. The exposure can be corrected in post, the sharpness is a fatal issue. 

Traduire
Community Expert ,
Sep 05, 2025 Sep 05, 2025

There are nearly 71,500,000 flower images on Adobe Stock. They are very difficult to get accepted, and if accepted, they would be lost in the search results. 9086 is underexposed. I like 5944, but black and white assets, while they do at times get accepted, buyers prefer color. Depth-of-field is an issue with a number of these, like 8203, which is too closely cropped as well.


Forum Volunteer | One thing I've learned from these forums is how to spell algorithm.
Traduire
Signaler
Directives de la communauté
Restez bienveillant et courtois, ne vous attribuez pas la paternité des créations d’autrui et assurez-vous de l’absence de doublons avant de poster du contenu. En savoir plus
community guidelines
Nouveau ici ,
Sep 05, 2025 Sep 05, 2025

Thank you, i'll keep in mind these!

Traduire
Signaler
Directives de la communauté
Restez bienveillant et courtois, ne vous attribuez pas la paternité des créations d’autrui et assurez-vous de l’absence de doublons avant de poster du contenu. En savoir plus
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 05, 2025 Sep 05, 2025

IMG_9086.JPG - very noisy 

IMG_6700.JPG - DOF is too shallow, leaving much of the bloom out of focus 

IMG_6718.JPG - again DIF too shallow, part if the bud are not sharply focused

IMG_6718.JPG - not well composed, you've cut off petals on the left side

 

Adobe already has many millions of similar flower images. I wouldn't bother submitting flowers unless you've found some rare under-represented species.

 

 

 

 

 

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
Traduire
Signaler
Directives de la communauté
Restez bienveillant et courtois, ne vous attribuez pas la paternité des créations d’autrui et assurez-vous de l’absence de doublons avant de poster du contenu. En savoir plus
community guidelines
Nouveau ici ,
Sep 05, 2025 Sep 05, 2025

Thanks for the advices, I'll look out for these, mostly the DOF, i see, it's a common mistake for now.

 

Traduire
Signaler
Directives de la communauté
Restez bienveillant et courtois, ne vous attribuez pas la paternité des créations d’autrui et assurez-vous de l’absence de doublons avant de poster du contenu. En savoir plus
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 05, 2025 Sep 05, 2025

Nighttime shots are very challenging, even for experts.  To get good results requires experience and proper equipment.

It's easier to shoot in daylight. 

 

 

 

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User, Community Expert & Moderator
Traduire
Signaler
Directives de la communauté
Restez bienveillant et courtois, ne vous attribuez pas la paternité des créations d’autrui et assurez-vous de l’absence de doublons avant de poster du contenu. En savoir plus
community guidelines
Nouveau ici ,
Sep 06, 2025 Sep 06, 2025

Yeah, I see now, thanks. For now I'll stick with daylight to avoid high ISO and nise. 

Traduire
Signaler
Directives de la communauté
Restez bienveillant et courtois, ne vous attribuez pas la paternité des créations d’autrui et assurez-vous de l’absence de doublons avant de poster du contenu. En savoir plus
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 06, 2025 Sep 06, 2025

A tripod and long exposures are helping with nighttime shots. As Nancy says, the ask for experience, but the results can be stunning. High ISO increases noise in a picture. If you can't compensate for that noise in post, it is indeed an issue for Adobe stock.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Traduire
Signaler
Directives de la communauté
Restez bienveillant et courtois, ne vous attribuez pas la paternité des créations d’autrui et assurez-vous de l’absence de doublons avant de poster du contenu. En savoir plus
community guidelines
Nouveau ici ,
Sep 07, 2025 Sep 07, 2025

Thanks for the tips! Rn I don't have a tripod, but with time, I will surely get one for those amazing long exposure shots! For now, I stick with handheld. 

Traduire
Signaler
Directives de la communauté
Restez bienveillant et courtois, ne vous attribuez pas la paternité des créations d’autrui et assurez-vous de l’absence de doublons avant de poster du contenu. En savoir plus
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 07, 2025 Sep 07, 2025

Tripods are essential for nightshots. You can also use a table or a wall or something else, to stabalize your camera. Bur a tripod is the most versatile and it's not that expensive.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Traduire
Signaler
Directives de la communauté
Restez bienveillant et courtois, ne vous attribuez pas la paternité des créations d’autrui et assurez-vous de l’absence de doublons avant de poster du contenu. En savoir plus
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 07, 2025 Sep 07, 2025
LA PLUS RÉCENTE

I found a nice used tripod at my camera store for almost nothing. Also inquire at pawn shops, and 2nd hand/thrift stores.

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User, Community Expert & Moderator
Traduire
Signaler
Directives de la communauté
Restez bienveillant et courtois, ne vous attribuez pas la paternité des créations d’autrui et assurez-vous de l’absence de doublons avant de poster du contenu. En savoir plus
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 06, 2025 Sep 06, 2025

Hello,

I think the composition could be better in this photo:

Ricky336_0-1757176771430.png

Not so good here.

There are indeed a lot of flower photos. It's been done to death.

 

Traduire
Signaler
Directives de la communauté
Restez bienveillant et courtois, ne vous attribuez pas la paternité des créations d’autrui et assurez-vous de l’absence de doublons avant de poster du contenu. En savoir plus
community guidelines
Nouveau ici ,
Sep 06, 2025 Sep 06, 2025

I see, thanks, I'll look for more unique themes!

Traduire
Signaler
Directives de la communauté
Restez bienveillant et courtois, ne vous attribuez pas la paternité des créations d’autrui et assurez-vous de l’absence de doublons avant de poster du contenu. En savoir plus
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 06, 2025 Sep 06, 2025

8229 is overexposed (has no blacks) and is not sharp. The exposure can be corrected in post, the sharpness is a fatal issue. 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Traduire
Signaler
Directives de la communauté
Restez bienveillant et courtois, ne vous attribuez pas la paternité des créations d’autrui et assurez-vous de l’absence de doublons avant de poster du contenu. En savoir plus
community guidelines
Nouveau ici ,
Sep 07, 2025 Sep 07, 2025

I used a close up filter for that pic, I think that is the problem, because it's a pretty cheap one. Defenetly can cause lack of sharpness, when paired with my kit objective. 

Traduire
Signaler
Directives de la communauté
Restez bienveillant et courtois, ne vous attribuez pas la paternité des créations d’autrui et assurez-vous de l’absence de doublons avant de poster du contenu. En savoir plus
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 07, 2025 Sep 07, 2025

You did use a hardware filter for your lens? So yo basically converted with this your lens, which is not a macro lens into a macro lens?

Anyhow: If an asset is not sharp when viewed at 100%, do not submit. Sharpness is a required property, and easy to check.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Traduire
Signaler
Directives de la communauté
Restez bienveillant et courtois, ne vous attribuez pas la paternité des créations d’autrui et assurez-vous de l’absence de doublons avant de poster du contenu. En savoir plus
community guidelines