Rejects and other similar images

 I know it's a "bot" that does that (my guess) 

 

By @Vanveen JF

Either you know or you guess, but in this case, you guessed, because real humans are moderating the submitted assets. 

On the accepted assets, you don't see the full quality, until you licence. So, you can't say, they have the same quality. 

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

Did you post all of your assets in one large batch? The conventional wisdom here in the forum is that posting small batches and waiting for feedback on those, correcting and resubmitting them, or at least learning from the rejects, is the "slow and steady" approach to growing your portfolio with the least rejects. 

As indicated above, Adobe provides no avenue for you to receive additional feedback on your rejects other than this forum. So if you'd like to upload 2-3 rejects here, the community members will be happy to provide feedback as to the possible reason for reject.

Rejections from Adobe are final and there isn't an appeals process or a way to contact the reviewers.  Like @Test Screen Name mentioned, post a few photos for the community volunteers to give feedback on if you'd like 🙂

Edit: Although rejections are final, if there are errors that are correctable you can fix them and resubmit.

Bot? No, humans.
Adobe Review? No, absolutely not. Adobe's job in reviewing includes keeping the costs down. They couldn't review hundreds of thousands of images a week if people could review. Better to reject many good ones than lose profit that way. But... if you'd like to share 1-3 (no more) original (not reduced or stamped) images, the experienced reviewers here may be able to give an idea of why they think this isn't what Adobe are accepting right now.