Participating Frequently

Answered

Rifiuto per problemi tecnici

Forum|Forum|4 years ago
November 16, 2021
4 replies
1689 views

Salve, secondo voi perché questa foto è stata scartata per "problemi tecnici"?

Piergiorgio Greco

This topic has been closed for replies.

Correct answer @MNiessenPhoto

Besides what has been said, a lot of artifacts in the sky and fringing.

The towers are much darker at the top than at the bottom, so I assume there's a gradient filter over the sky.

Clearly way overedited.

As @Marianne-Deiters said, the photo might have been better before editing.

A lot of "tough love" in our answers, but don't be discouraged. Practice makes perfect, as they say 😉

Hope that helps,

Michael

_____________

Michael Niessen - Photographer, photo-editor, educator

Abambo

Community Expert

Even on the "thumbnail" picture that you posted, you have multiple problems. That can't be better with the original resolution picture. Look at your picture at 100% and 200% to see the defects.

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

P

Piergiorgio0D44Author

Participating Frequently

Thank you!

Abambo

Community Expert

You're welcome!

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

@MNiessenPhotoCorrect answer

Legend

Besides what has been said, a lot of artifacts in the sky and fringing.

The towers are much darker at the top than at the bottom, so I assume there's a gradient filter over the sky.

Clearly way overedited.

As @Marianne-Deiters said, the photo might have been better before editing.

A lot of "tough love" in our answers, but don't be discouraged. Practice makes perfect, as they say 😉

Hope that helps,

Michael

_____________

Michael Niessen - Photographer, photo-editor, educator

Photo-editing (Ps/Lr/LrC) and photography workshops & one-on-one training (off- and online)

P

Piergiorgio0D44Author

Participating Frequently

Tank you so much for your advices. Now, what do you think about?

Abambo

Community Expert

This edit is much better. As you did not post the full resolution picture, it is, however, difficult to see some possible defects.

I would suggest that you work the whites (right part of the histogram):

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

RALPH_L

Community Expert

Too much saturation, horizon not level, and the birds need to be removed.

P

Piergiorgio0D44Author

Participating Frequently

Now?

Marianne-Deiters

Participating Frequently

Much better!

Marianne-Deiters

Participating Frequently

I believe the photo was better before editing. The white balance is wrong. It's too yellowish, the temperature too high. The contrast was set too high. In addition, white was reinforced, so the lights are blown out.

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Scanning file for viruses.

This file cannot be downloaded