Participant

Answered

Similar Content

Forum|Forum|6 months ago
September 4, 2025
4 replies
694 views

When I create content, I always try my best to ensure it does not resemble any other existing content. Still, when Adobe Stock’s system detects it as “similar content,” it truly feels disappointing and disheartening for me. I always follow Adobe Stock’s guidelines and will continue to do so in the future.

If it had been clearly mentioned why my content specifically fell under the category of “similar content,” it would have been much more helpful for me to improve going forward. I admit that making mistakes is natural. However, I want to learn from this mistake and continue moving forward with greater responsibility. Thank you.

Troubleshooting

Correct answer Jill_C

The "similars" rejections are often unwarranted and inexplicable. Unfortunately, there's nothing we Contributors can do about it, so try not to feel disheartened. You might find that images rejected by Adobe are accepted by other agencies.

E

Edward_St

Inspiring

The Ai that dose this check has a very big pool of content to compare. I'm guessing it's not really checking for quality, it probably dose a very shallow, mass check. To make it more accurate they will probably have to do something more dramatic, maybe a purge of the content .. who knows. I am starting to get similar ofr vector as well, and that is really annoying.

Nancy OShea

Community Expert

The Ai that dose this check has a very big pool of content to compare. I'm guessing it's not really checking for quality, it probably dose a very shallow, mass check.
By @Edward_St

=========

If an AI bot does anything, it's likely searching similar keywords in Stock's database.

But that's just speculation.

Stock does not share their secrets with us.

If they did, they'd have to give us a lethal dose of poison. 😉

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert

F

Florina.

Participant

Adobe Stock flags similar content mostly when the system finds your submission too close to something already in the library, even if unintentional. It doesn’t mean your work lacks value, it’s just a quality control step. The best approach is to keep experimenting with fresh angles, variations, and unique elements so your portfolio stands out.

Nancy OShea

Community Expert

I don't know what this represents. It's too small.

My guess is that the AI bot saw something in it that triggered a 'similar content' strike.

This is what Adobe Stock has to say about 'Similar Content.'

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/how-to-submit-distinct-content.html

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert

Jill_C

Correct answer

Community Expert

The "similars" rejections are often unwarranted and inexplicable. Unfortunately, there's nothing we Contributors can do about it, so try not to feel disheartened. You might find that images rejected by Adobe are accepted by other agencies.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

F

Foysol_Ahmed4579Author

Participant

The contents that were rejected by Adobe, I uploaded them to other
platforms, and all of them were approved. But my most favorite platform is
Adobe Stock, where unfortunately those contents are getting rejected

daniellei4510

Community Expert

Am I able to upload at Getty something that has already been accepted at Adobe? And keep the same content on both platforms? Thanks

Adobe wouldn't mind, but I think Getty requires exclusivity and does not allow submissions to appear on other stock sites. But you'll need to research Getty's terms and conditions.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Scanning file for viruses.

This file cannot be downloaded