Participating Frequently

Answered

Solicitação de Orientações para Aprimorar Qualidade de Foto Rejeitada no Adobe Stock

Forum|Forum|2 years ago
January 31, 2024
4 replies
1334 views

Olá, comunidade do Adobe Stock,

Sou um novo colaborador aqui na plataforma e estou em processo de aprendizado sobre os critérios de envio de fotografias. Recentemente, submeti uma foto que foi rejeitada com a seguinte justificativa: 'Infelizmente, esta imagem não atende aos nossos padrões de qualidade devido a problemas de exposição, foco suave, filtragem excessiva ou artefatos/ruído'.

Gostaria de solicitar a ajuda de vocês para entender melhor esses pontos. Se possível, gostaria de mais detalhes sobre os aspectos específicos que levaram à rejeição da minha foto. Essa orientação será muito valiosa para que eu possa melhorar minhas próximas submissões e atender aos padrões de qualidade exigidos pelo Adobe Stock.

Agradeço antecipadamente por qualquer feedback ou dica que possam oferecer!

This topic has been closed for replies.

Correct answer Abambo

You can do anything you want deliberately, when you submit pictures to social media, but here you really need “correct” pictures. If they are beautiful, mysterious or anything else, great, but they need to meet the quality requirements first. It's like building the most beautiful car, but it does not drive.

Jill_C

Community Expert

Foto004-NG.JPG - depth of field is too shallow, it's underexposed and there is chroma noise in the darker areas.

Foto003-NG.JPG - underexposed, noise and blownout area in the upper left corner

Foto002-NG.JPG - underexposed. Black areas appear to have no detail whatsoever

Foto001-NG.jpg - same issues as Foto004

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

PegoeLevoAuthor

Participating Frequently

Thank you very much for your response and valuable evaluation, I learned a lot from these submissions and the responses I received!
In the photo "Foto004-NG.JPG" everything was intentional but I hadn't noticed the chromatic noise, the rest doesn't seem to work out very well, I have to change that in the future!
In the photo "Foto003-NG.JPG" it's true, I hadn't noticed the blownout area, I left it underexposed on purpose to create a mysterious look, which didn't work and I couldn't deal with the noise!
In the photo "Foto002-NG.JPG" I left it underexposed because the sky was turning light navy blue as I increased the exposure and as for the black areas, I hadn't seen those details, it seems that my approach didn't work out very well either!
In the photo "Foto002-NG.JPG" same thing in the case of the exhibition, it was deliberate to create a mysterious air perhaps, I see now that I shouldn't have done that!
Can I edit photos 1, 2 and 3, increasing the exposure in Lighroom and re-sending them again?

Jill_C

Community Expert

Digital noise, chroma noise, and underexposure can possibly be fixed in PS or LRC; however focus issues and blownout areas cannot be fixed - unless you can replace the blownout area with data from other areas in the photo.

The flower image can be lightened a bit, but it will still probably be rejected because it's not in sharp focus. Zoom in to 100%+, and you'll see that the pistils and stamens are blurry. The general advice here is that one shouldn't expend much energy on uploading floral images since they are already quite over-represented in the Adobe Stock database. The exception would be if you had captured an unusual/rare variety, in which case you'd need to include both the common and Latin terms for the flower in your keywords.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

Abambo

Community Expert

The rejection reason is "quality issues", the rest is stock text, not exactly targeted to your assets, but only the most common errors. In your case, the major problem is exposure, which needs to be addressed. As it is true that nights pictures live from the light dark contrast, you still need to carefully expose the picture and later edit the asset, to get a correctly exposed picture, with no shadows disapearing in the complete dark and no highlights getting clipped and taking away detail in the picture. It's very difficult to work this out, as the dynamic range of camera sensors is limited.

In addition, looking at one picture, I detected this:

This will result probably in a subsequential IP refusal. You need to edit out any identifiers and logos before submitting.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

PegoeLevoAuthor

Participating Frequently

Oh!! Thank you very much for your response and review! I hadn't seen that sign! Can I edit this photo and re-send it again?

Ricky336

Community Expert

Hello,

To begin with, your photos are a tad underexposed. You need to add more light to them.

Read these links about exposure and composition. This also needs work.

RALPH_L

Community Expert

All of your photos are too dark. Check your histogram. It probably indicates all pixels are on the left side. Your photos are also too soft. Use software in post processing to sharpen the subjects. The horizon on your second photo is not level and should be on a Rule of Thirds line or in the middle. The third and last photos have blown out highlights.

PegoeLevoAuthor

Participating Frequently

Thanks for your review! I purposely made the photo of the flower darker to give it an air. Leave the photo with a mysterious and introspective air through the darkening, but I don't think it worked, could I edit it and send it again?

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Scanning file for viruses.

This file cannot be downloaded