Technical problems ???

New Here ,
Nov 19, 2021 Nov 19, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi, can anyone please write me what could be the reasons for rejecting this photo? And what should be the parameters of photography? (dimensions, pixels, size)
Thanks and good light to all.

TOPICS
Troubleshooting

Views

75

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 3 Correct answers

Enthusiast , Nov 19, 2021 Nov 19, 2021
Ahoj Jirko, "what could be the reasons for rejecting this photo?"You were given a reason, possibly "technical issues".It is not level and has some color noise, particularly in the water. I also think it's a bit too warm. "what should be the parameters of photography? (dimensions, pixels, size)"As indicated on the Adobe Stock contributors' website, minimum 4 megapixels (max. 100 megapixels) and max 45 MB files. Hope that helps,Michael_____________Michael Niessen - Photographer, photo-editor, educ...

Likes

Translate

Translate
Adobe Community Professional , Nov 19, 2021 Nov 19, 2021
I realize youz are new but if I have said it once I've said it a hundred times. "View your image at a high magnificaton!!!!!" Here is a portion of your photo at 450%. Do you see what I see? By the way, your horizon is not level.  You should at least have seen that! To answer your other questions: https://helpx.adobe.com/content/dam/help/en/stock/contributor/Adobe_Stock_Contributor_Guide.pdf 

Likes

Translate

Translate
Adobe Community Professional , Nov 21, 2021 Nov 21, 2021
Hello, I respectively disagree with @Ralph Lear . It is not necessary to view at such high magnification. 100%-200% is enough. The main issue with your photo in this case is composition. Your horizon isn't level, and the photo is too warm. Have a read of this from Adobe about how to create better photos: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/how-to/tips-stock-image-acceptance.html?set=stock--fundamentals--adobe-stock-contributor and about adjusting white balance: https://www.adobe.com/creativecloud/photography/discover/white-balance.html...

Likes

Translate

Translate
Enthusiast ,
Nov 19, 2021 Nov 19, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Ahoj Jirko,

 

"what could be the reasons for rejecting this photo?"

You were given a reason, possibly "technical issues".

It is not level and has some color noise, particularly in the water. I also think it's a bit too warm.

 

"what should be the parameters of photography? (dimensions, pixels, size)"

As indicated on the Adobe Stock contributors' website, minimum 4 megapixels (max. 100 megapixels) and max 45 MB files.

 

Hope that helps,

Michael

_____________

Michael Niessen - Photographer, photo-editor, educator

Photo-editing (Ps/Lr/LrC) and photography workshops & one-on-one training (off- and online)

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Nov 20, 2021 Nov 20, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

O. K. thank you

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Nov 19, 2021 Nov 19, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I realize youz are new but if I have said it once I've said it a hundred times.

"View your image at a high magnificaton!!!!!"

Here is a portion of your photo at 450%.

Do you see what I see? By the way, your horizon is not level. 

You should at least have seen that!

Untitled.jpg

To answer your other questions:

https://helpx.adobe.com/content/dam/help/en/stock/contributor/Adobe_Stock_Contributor_Guide.pdf 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Nov 20, 2021 Nov 20, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

o. k. Thanks for the reply

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Nov 21, 2021 Nov 21, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hello,

I respectively disagree with @Ralph Lear . It is not necessary to view at such high magnification. 100%-200% is enough.

The main issue with your photo in this case is composition. Your horizon isn't level, and the photo is too warm.

Have a read of this from Adobe about how to create better photos:
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/how-to/tips-stock-image-acceptance.html?set=stock--fundamentals--adobe...

and about adjusting white balance:
https://www.adobe.com/creativecloud/photography/discover/white-balance.html

and image quality:
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

 

 

 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Nov 22, 2021 Nov 22, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST
quote

Hi, can anyone please write me what could be the reasons for rejecting this photo?


By @Jirka21818544btk6

As pointed out, Adobe gave you a reason for the rejection which is probably "technical issues" as there are many with this picture, mainly because of excessive processing. Phone cameras often do that to give a pleasant picture on the small, but very brilliant phone screens. But as soon as you look into the details (at 100% and 200% of magnification), you will see multiple issues, like missing detail, fringing, artefacts etc.

100%: Check the sharpness and detail. Your picture is missing detail because of excessive post-processing.

200%: Look for artefacts. Most of them are visible at 100%, but at 200% you don't need to do an effort to see them. Don't try to assess the sharpness at 200%, your picture will look out of focus at 200%, but that is OK. Excessive sharpening leads to the colour fringing that @Ralph Lear points out. It's visible at 200% without any effort.

I sometimes go to 300%, but that is rarely necessary. I, however, never do in betweens, as the computer cannot easily magnify the image correctly if the magnification is not an entire multiplicate. 100% is one pixel in the image is one pixel on screen. 200% is one pixel in the image is 4 pixels on screen, 300% is then 9 pixels on screen.

quote

And what should be the parameters of photography? (dimensions, pixels, size)


By @Jirka21818544btk6

Incorrect parameters here get your image refused during the upload. If you can submit to the moderators, these basic parameters are correct.

Technical issues:

As for the image colour temperature, it is true that it is warm, but if it is off, it is not far from the ideal value.

As soon as you have a water line, you need to level your picture according to this line, as the water is always at level. Your phone's software made some errors with the noise reduction which eats detail, where detail should be:

Abambo_0-1637586255245.png

The colours are a little oversaturated and the shadows require a push to get more detail with the boats.

 

In addition to the technical issues pointed out, you have also IP issues, as there are logos and sip identifiers that require to be photoshopped out. No need, however, to do so with this picture, as anyhow the some technical issues are not correctable.

 

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines