I assume they have been rejected for quality issues. It's a nice collection, but there are a few problems with the images.
5276: Missing contrasts, slightly washed out colours, compression artefacts. It's great for an iPhone picture, but when you look at 100%, you see the issues.
5302: Same issues, but in addition, the focus is bad.
5305: Yellowish light reflections would suggest that you used the wrong artificial lighting. In addition, the focus is not good. Looks somehow to me like a slight camera shake.
5295: A bit more contrast, a bit more saturation and it may pass.
5294:
If you look here at the finger, you see colour clipping. And the phone's processing probably eliminated the fingerprint's fine structure as noise.
ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Assuming these are actual photographs from a camera, I think you need to work on lighting & increasing your depth of field to improve overall focus. Customers searching for strawberries want well lit and properly focused strawberries.
Well. For starters, the red color of the strawberry is not the proper red : ). Or maybe your fingernail is not trendy enough : )? Who knows? The reviewer had a bad day. No point trying to figure it out. To my surprise Shutterstock accepted 19 out of the 20 that Adobe rejected 17 of. It just became nuts lately. I am not uploading here fot now. Not until they come to their senses. I won't waste your time. Not sure if I helped much.
Are these photos or Generative AI? IMG-5302.jpg - everything is quite blurry, and the texture of the background is quite odd. The leaves don't look like strawberry leaves.
IMG-5305.jpg - the cake is very blurred, with an odd texture and color