Unfair rejection in Automated REVIEW! Common Issues?

Quality comprises a lot more than just resolution and file size. In AI images, details matter a lot. There is no way to dispute the findings of the Moderators; however, you can re-edit and resubmit.

These are NOT perfect.  Sorry.  Adjusted for improper lighting, the problems are more obvious.

The 'odd-man-out' concept is not new, I see it a lot here.  But this one has some obvious problems that make it unsuitable for commercial use.  Drawing errors, chromatic aberrations, blown out regions on the hat, etc...

No generative AI is perfect.  Machines are stupid about the real world.  They can't be trusted to make good choices.  Enter human Contributors who can identify machine-made mistakes and hopefully correct them.

Rejection is not personal.  It's a business decision.  Accepting bad images into inventory would jeopardize Adobe Stock's reputation and diminish customer trust.  That would be bad for everyone. Especially Contributors who are trying to sell their work here.

Hope that helps.

I like the first image, but Adobe rarely if ever accepts black and white images with localized colorization. Moderation is done by humans. Algorithms would probably have accepted both images. And no, there is no way to dispute a moderators decisions.