what do you think about it?

[skols96]

cosa ne pensi a riguardo?

[reedesign1912 · Accepted solution]

@skols96  are you asking for a critique because it was rejected?

I assume it was rejected for technical reasons.  It is underexposed, very noisy and not in focus.  It looks like there is motion blur as the flower was probably moving in the breeze when you took the photo.

Before submitting your photos to Adobe Stock, it is always necessary to review your photos at 100% -200% magnification to see any obvious issues.

Here are some links that you might find useful regarding stock photography, do's and don'ts and reasons for rejection.

• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustrations.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html

I hope this helps.

[Abambo · Accepted solution]

Penso che non sia adatta per le azioni a causa di molteplici ragioni, come elaborato da @reedesign1912. Vorrei aggiungere l'inquadratura, dato che avere il fiore ritagliato nell'angolo in basso a sinistra con una recinzione di metallo per il resto dell'immagine non fa una buona foto, anche se l'immagine sarebbe stata perfetta altrimenti.

[RALPH_L]

Sorry, but it is underexposed, out of focus, the yellow is oversaturated, there is noise, the background should be darker, and it is poorly cropped.

[Jill_C]

Search the Adobe Stock database for Easter+lily which will display ~20,000 beautiful images. This will allow you to understand the quality level that is required for an image to be accepted into the database.