What's going on with Adobe Stock?

It might be my imagination, but I'm getting the feeling that accounts with an extreme number of AI assets under review do indeed get priority. For example, if a contributor submits 1000 assets in a day (more than likely unchecked and unedited), those 1000 assets get reviewed en masse by the moderators (1000 in/1000 reviewed all at once).

I try to maintain anywhere from 30 to 60 assets under review at any given time. Let’s say I start Monday out with 50 assets. By Friday, I’ve had, let’s say, 30 reviewed. I’ll submit 4 to 6 per day in an effort to keep up, perhaps leaving me with 25 by Friday. I’ll try to add more over the weekend (when I might only have 1 or 2 reviewed at most), to get back to 40 or so by Monday.

Point is, I’ve never been “cleaned out” in one fell swoop as some people who submit hundreds of AI assets at once are claiming. @Abambo  is correct: even though I submit AI and AI only, a limit of 50 to 100 per day (or even per week as far as I’m concerned) should be taken into consideration for AI.

If for some there are review delays of 2 to 3 months, while others are reviewed immediately, there is something wrong.

By @BestProImages

Sure. However, nobody knows why some assets get stuck in the moderation queue. 2 months is still good, however, as the announced waiting time is 8 weeks. I would start resubmitting after 6 months.