Why? Porqué?

Hi @txema_alvarez 

That is a beautiful file you have. Please consult with the rejection reason on your contributor page at the "Not Accepted" tab.for the rejection reason. My guess is that your file was rejected for technical reason or Intellectual Property violation due to the markings on the bicycle. The white balance is not correct. It seem a little blue. The blue cast is more obvious at the side of the wall. Zooming a bit will make it more obvious. You may correct that along with removal of all trademarks, logos, etc from the bicycle. After you are done, you may re-upload. If there is an intellectual property reason, you will be notified of such. As far as I am aware, lighthouses are not rejected for IP.

Best wishes

JG

Lo mas probrable es que reconozcan el faro como una propiedad intelectual, o buscas el releases del ente o no te la van a aprobar nunca.

Many famous landmarks, historic locations (lighthouses, bridges, etc...) are protected.  You many need a release to use it commercially.

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/property-release.html

Por favor, dé la razón exacta de la negativa. Esto es importante para que no tengamos que adivinar.

También puede consultar la documentación de los colaboradores para obtener más información sobre las denegaciones.

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html?topic=/stock/contributor/morehelp/review.ug.js

Veo dos números en tu foto:

1. la falta de contraste, que sería "problema técnico"
2. los logotipos de la bicicleta, eso sería la propiedad intelectual. 

Nb: I'm moving this to the stock contributor forum.