Participant

Answered

Why they rejected all my picutes?

Forum|Forum|11 months ago
March 27, 2025
3 replies
2474 views

Hi,

I recently decided to become a collaborator in a couple of stock photo sites. Not to list the other two but most of my pictures have been accepted. The only ones that were rejected had brands or intellectual property issues. I never had a picture rejected over quality. Yet Adobe Stock rejected every single one I submitted and I am curious of why. I heard they tend to be more picky than other platforms but I don't know where I got wrong in those.

Correct answer daniellei4510

Such a decision can depend on which moderator you get. Moderators are human and can make errors. Some are stricter than others. They make snap judgments, probably to fill a quota for the day, and have only a few seconds to select a reason for approval or refusal. And they can only pick one reason out of many, even when multiple issues occur.

Abambo

Community Expert

lifeguard: colour noise and white outlines due to oversharpening.

I just marked some of the issues here. Indeed the whole building should be rejected due to quality issues.

Adobe is master on its own turf. And it's indeed picky about quality issues, at least for photos.

As a tipp posting here: less is more. You get better analyses if you post only 3 assets instead of 10, as fully analysing an asset takes time, and we are doing this on our free time. You should be able to check your other assets on your own, by looking for similar artefacts at 100% or even 200%.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

RALPH_L

Community Expert

Here are some tips:

Remove identifying markings.

Remove unwanted objects.

Compose for the Rule of Thirds.
Place emphasis on your subject.

Correct or remove overexposed and/or underexposed areas.

Sharpen for crisp photos.

D

Diogo_Beltran2091Author

Participant

Thanks for the feedback

M

mazhar_4720

Participant

I need help with all my pictures assets

daniellei4510

Community Expert

gado3008: sun glare

whitepeakcock: depth of field too shallow

queenbutter: needs sharpening

reptcheca: model release required

hungria: depth of field too shallow; peppers in front should be in the sharpest focus in this case

Just picked a few at random. Adobe Stock has very high standards compared to other stock sites. We get a lot of posts here from people saying along the lines of, "other stock sites and have accepted these and they have even sold." But that is not a guarantee Adobe will accept their assets.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.

M

marco_antonio_7530

Participant

I have the same problem, some of the works were accepted and others were not. They did not specify why, just the general quality issue. However, there are no differences between accepted and not accepted works, including in relation to titles and keywords...

Abambo

Community Expert

I have the same problem, some of the works were accepted and others were not. They did not specify why, just the general quality issue. However, there are no differences between accepted and not accepted works, including in relation to titles and keywords...

By @marco_antonio_7530

Well, that needs to be proven. Mostly it means that the accepted assets should also be rejected, but the moderator did not take a deep look at the asset or was at the end of their shift, and was tired looking at thousands of assets.

Keywords and titles are not quality relevant. Quality issues are always based on the quality of the asset and means that you have quality issues that should be detected by checking your asset at 100%.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Scanning file for viruses.

This file cannot be downloaded