Participant

Answered

Why was this rejected?

Forum|Forum|3 years ago
January 13, 2023
5 replies
771 views

Hi

I'm new to Adobe stock and hoped someone more experienced could give me feedback on why yhis image may have been rejected on "Quality Issues"

I have completed a series of surreal images but now think I may have wasted my time.

This topic has been closed for replies.

Correct answer Abambo

I'm wondering if this is an AI generated illustration

By @George_F

I did not wonder, it is, at 99% sure!

Nice find George!

G

g_parryAuthor

Participant

Thanks to everybody for the answers, I am always grateful for people who take the time to help us sad newbies. It is an AI-generated image and I believe that I did follow the guide to the letter - I guess I will have to regenerate it and look at a better method for upscaling it. My guess as to the artifacts is that I generated a jpg file and upscaled it t a png file will jpg to jpg next time.

Again - Thanks all

T

Test Screen Name

Legend

"I will have to regenerate it and look at a better method for upscaling it."

Adobe's rules are absolutely clear on this point. You MUST NOT upscale it. If generating an AI, it has to be generated at the final size - and the AI must not be upscaling either.

T

Test Screen Name

Legend

If it is AI, did you follow all the specific rules for AI (special tags, not described as photo, check rights contract from AI company etc. etc.)?

Abambo

Community Expert

See here for more info on AI assets: announcing-the-adobe-stock-policy-on-generative-ai-content

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

George_F

Community Expert

I'm wondering if this is an AI generated illustration, and if you submitted it as such?

Along with the technical flaws the others have pointed out, there is what appears to be a signature in the lower right portion of image.

George F, Photographer & Forum Volunteer

Abambo

Correct answer

Community Expert

I'm wondering if this is an AI generated illustration

By @George_F

I did not wonder, it is, at 99% sure!

Nice find George!

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

RALPH_L

Community Expert

Also this is a PNG file. PNG files are to have a transparent background.

Henrik Heigl

Community Expert

Hi,

it seems that the lines and edges are very blurry.

Before you submit, please review the submission guidelines carefully and compare your work with other Stock inventory.

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustrations.html
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/how-to/tips-stock-image-acceptance.html

Hope that helps.

regards,Henrik

G

g_parryAuthor

Participant

Hi Henrik

Thanks for the response and I would agree 100% if this was a photograph of something that actually existed, but this is intended to be a representation of a surreal painting where blurry edges would be sort of expected?

Thanks

Glenn

Abambo

Community Expert

but this is intended to be a representation of a surreal painting where blurry edges would be sort of expected?

By @g_parry

No! Even as a surreal image, you should follow the guidelines. But there are not only blurry edges, but also compression artefacts. Why that is, is not understandable as your image is a png 😉 :

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Scanning file for viruses.

This file cannot be downloaded