To sell images commercially on Stock, you need the museum's permission. Otherwise Adobe can't accept the legal risks for what may happen if the museum decides to bring a law suit. This protects everyone, including you.
Underexposed, blurry, noisy and white balance is off. If the images weren't rejected for technical flaws, it's possible that they would have been rejected for IP violations since you would have needed a release from the artist.
Adobe are looking for world class commercial photography that follows all their rules exactly. Perhaps your work so far does not do this, or is not world class commercial photography. Adobe gave you a reason.
We are not Adobe and cannot see your work. If you would like the community members here to review your work please share some.
- maximum 3
- original files UNMODIFIED since you submitted them
Thank you for the photos. Now, please tell us Adobe's exact reasons for rejecting them. They always give a reason, even if some people find it vague (like "artefacts" or "technical issues").