Bad AI Art that Needs to Be Removed

[A4292]

I found some obviously bad AI images that should be removed. 

File #564717303 by Azar. This one is not marked as AI, but even Mary can't help staring at all those toes.

File #571073616 by MegaMindDigital

File #571071428 by Scrudje

File #571029508 by Scott

File #571029514 by Scott

I would love to have a filter that removes AI art from my search results. 

[Abambo]

56471730: Was that one of the multiple wonders that Jesus performed:

Mary is a blood sucking vampire, if I look at this correctly 😄 :

@Contributor1 ?

[Contributor1 · Accepted solution]

Hello, agreed there's some questionable assets here. I've sent these 5 assets to the content team for review. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the assets.

[sdCreative]

There are a lot of bad ai images. Need a better tool report issues with them. Here are more. This contributor has uploaded tons of these. 

[daniellei4510]

Inception in Barbieland.

[Jill_C]

Wow, these are really weird... Hopefully @Contributor1 can also toss these back over the fence to the Moderation team for another look !

[Contributor1]

Hello all, I'm sorry but I've been asked not to send back odd generative images anymore that are properly marked. If you wish to remove this content from your search results, you can click into the search filter options on the side bar and select “Exclude Generative AI.”

[Justin2933350612u3]

On the flip side, what about very simple repetitive Ai images that should be removed? This contributor is flooding the zone with a mixed bag of Ai generated images not being labeled as such, small gradients, individual clip art. Some of these gradients are tagged as Ai some are not, and why are low res gradients being uploaded in these quantities in the first place? What are contributors like this adding to Adobe Stock?

Ai generated gradient? Really? Why is this on here and why are there so many?? File #546668298

Contributor https://stock.adobe.com/search?creator_id=210522845&filters%5Bcontent_type%3Aphoto%5D=1&filters%5Bco...

[Jill_C]

There is indeed a lot of low quality junk on that account, and the Contributor has certainly violated the guidelines on submitting way too many similars for many of their designs. It does seem that they've stopped uploading images though because the most recent image was quite some time ago, based on the asset number. Probably earned very few sales since most of those scribbles could be done by anyone with even a minimal knowledge of digital design tools.

[Justin2933350612u3]

Thanks for looking into that, Jill. Feel free to delete/remove this and the above comment if it doesn't add to the discussion or comes off as rude. My frustration regarding those issues seeps out sometimes.

[Jill_C]

No problem - I share your frustration that so much crap has invaded the Adobe Stock database, and there doesn't seem to be a concerted effort to clean it up, nor even a supported method of reporting them when we see them.

[Abambo]

This contributor could easily be blocked for spamming the database. The effect they are attributing to those thousands of assets can easily be realized by a very untalented used with free tools.