Content ID claim from Artlist Ltd

[copyrightmatters]

I'v got licensed Adobe Stock music asset and downloaded it and used it as a YouTube intro song.

I recieved a Content ID claim from Artlist Ltd, so I put in the license number I received from Adobe Stock and filed an appeal, but it was rejected.

When I went to the artlist site, it was confirmed that only the artists were different with the same music.

The song in question is called "Get That Feeling" , and the links are belowed.

https://stock.adobe.com/kr/search/audio?k=709714670

https://artlist.io/royalty-free-music/song/get-that-feeling/119836

[Abambo]

Did you follow the procedure as described here: https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2020/06/16/adobe-stock-audio-content-id-claims?

It is very important to follow that procedure very carefully.

[media@fbr]

Also recieved a Content ID claim on YouTube from Artlist Ltd for a track called Monster by AlexGrohl, which Adobe Stock credits to 'santos bryan' as well...

Super disappointing if Essential Sounds in Premiere Pro is pushing content which isn't owned by the actual license holder. 

Appealed the rejection but after discovering your similar situation, fearing the worst. 

[Abambo]

It's an unfortunate situation. If you have followed the rules, they need to accept.

[media@fbr]

If Adobe is licensing content that it (its user) doesn't own, why should the actual copyright holder accept it?

[EvilBug1 · Accepted solution]

media@fbr Really sorry you are experiencig this. Would you mind sharing the exact asset, so we can help better here? Or if you don't feel comfortable sharing anything here, please contact customer support and get a ticket logged. 

-EB

[media@fbr]

Sure, the Asset ID is #709714646. The track is called 'Monster' and it states the author is 'santos bryan/Jamendo'.

And after two days, there has been no movement on the Copyright appeal from the Publisher on YouTube either.

[EvilBug1]

Thanks media@fbr .
The reported asset has been submitted to our content team for re-audition. 
Meanwhile, I have granted your credit back, so you can swith to other assets while we work on the re-audition. If there is anything else you can do to help, please feel free to contact customer support. 

Thanks,

-EB

[Abambo]

If Adobe is licensing content that it (its user) doesn't own, why should the actual copyright holder accept it?

media@fbr,

Correct.

@Contributor1 ?

[EvilBug1 · Accepted solution]

@copyrightmatters We are sorry you are experience. We do our best to review all assests to make sure they are legilimate. 
I have returned the credit back to you, so you can switch to a different asset. This asset listed above will be and reported will be re-audited. 
If there is anything else we can help, please contact customer support and get a ticket logged. We will be able to follow up better there. 

-EB

[M Hayward · Accepted solution]

Information on how to report suspected misuse of content can be found here: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/how-to-report-suspected-misuse-of-your-intellectual-p...

Kind regards,

Mat Hayward