Logos are not to be used as logos
So I purchased Illustrator after calling and speaking with a representative about ability to make a logo from editing a stock photo or using certain layers from a stock photo to put on my business building and website. The person I spoke with said I would be able to do this by purchasing the proper license from the stock photo I wished to edit. She walked me though it step by step and even said the photo is then not available to others after my purchase and is mine. Come to find out that's not true at all. If I would have known this I wouldn't have wasted money on Illustrator. I called the representative to get clarification prior to my purchase to be sure and was completely mislead. There are other drawing/paint programs available that cost a fraction of the price. I went with Adobe because there was a specific logo stock photo in which I wanted to use a flower from. If you can't even use these logo photos as your own or license them to your business, what is the point in selling extended licenses? Why even advertise logo photos? What else would someone want a logo for if not to brand something or copyright it? Typically people use logos to identify their business, organization or item... In fact that's the definition of a logo.. If you plan to temporarily use the photo you purchased (maybe for some flyers or invitations etc.) then maybe it's a good option. But if you plan to make an image as your own, don't bother, you can't. They sell logo photos not to be used as logos... SMH
