Skip to main content
Inspiring
November 18, 2022
Answered

Mockup license

  • November 18, 2022
  • 2 replies
  • 1187 views

Hello:

 

I write here because chat support had no clue, and the simply could send me to the licensing terms that I already had read. 

The question is simple. I am going to sell my posters on ETSY and would like a few mockups to showcase my posters. But these are for showcase how it would look in a real environment but those images are not going to be sent to the client . A print of my poster is going to be send after purchase.

So can mockups to showcase products be purchased with a  regular license or do they need an extended one ?

Thnak you very much

 

Cristian Baitg

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Abambo

I do not think that @mastix can ues the watermarked files for his application. 

If I understand Christian correctly, he is not using the assets for for creating (example) an advert with a stock asset and showing that to a customer, but his product is his own creation, that he want's to photoshop into an Adobe stock asset, to present his product in a pleasant way.

 

In this case, he could use the watermarked version to test his designs, but as soon as he is publishing what he tested, he will need to buy a licence.

 

Look here for more information on licensing: https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock/links-for-licensing-terms/td-p/11366788
(Disclaimer: As always with licensing, this is my interpretation of the rules. I think they are correct and advice is based on reading and interpreting the licence terms and on fair use for both the buyer and the artist/stock company, but I cannot rule out that my interpretation is wrong. I'm not an Adobe employee).

2 replies

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
November 18, 2022

It is a correct answer of Adobe employees to send you to the licence terms, as those are the legal binding documents. If they say something other than that, they may make a statement that binds the company. If that statement is in contrary to the terms, there would be a problem. 

 

So let me analyze this: you are selling your own assets and those assets do not contain stock assets. You want to use stock assets to create a pleasant presentation of your items, so that the potential buyer sees how your items could be presented. That's a typical use for a standard license. 

 

Look here for more information on licensing: https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock/links-for-licensing-terms/td-p/11366788
(Disclaimer: As always with licensing, this is my interpretation of the rules. I think they are correct and advice is based on reading and interpreting the licence terms and on fair use for both the buyer and the artist/stock company, but I cannot rule out that my interpretation is wrong. I'm not an Adobe employee).

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
mastixAuthor
Inspiring
November 18, 2022

Thank you. That's what I was thinking, too. But I am also not 100% sure and I want to be so to not do a wrong purchase. I was hoping to get a clear answer as yours by the official support chat team. Unfortunately, that was not the case. And I wonder of what use they really are if they just send you to the agreement, and they don't clarify. I would not waste my time and theirs too. 

Again your input is valuable and if it is confirmed by an official Adobe Stock employee it would be more reassuring. But I also think that it is covered my the regular license.

Kind regards

Cristian

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
November 18, 2022

It won't be confirmed by Adobe employees. As I said, any statement from Adobe would be a committment by Adobe and their comittment are the licensing terms. If you want a legal answer you need to ask an IP lawyer.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
November 18, 2022

It is my "opinion" that you can create a mock-up with images that still bear the Adobe watermark, which will make it clear that your mock-up is not the final product. 

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
Abambo
Community Expert
AbamboCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
November 18, 2022

I do not think that @mastix can ues the watermarked files for his application. 

If I understand Christian correctly, he is not using the assets for for creating (example) an advert with a stock asset and showing that to a customer, but his product is his own creation, that he want's to photoshop into an Adobe stock asset, to present his product in a pleasant way.

 

In this case, he could use the watermarked version to test his designs, but as soon as he is publishing what he tested, he will need to buy a licence.

 

Look here for more information on licensing: https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock/links-for-licensing-terms/td-p/11366788
(Disclaimer: As always with licensing, this is my interpretation of the rules. I think they are correct and advice is based on reading and interpreting the licence terms and on fair use for both the buyer and the artist/stock company, but I cannot rule out that my interpretation is wrong. I'm not an Adobe employee).

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer