J'ai acheté des photos en licence standard et pour l'une d'elle, j'utilise une partie de la photo pour présenter un produit sur un site e-commerce.
La photo ne figure que sur le site, pas physiquement sur le produit.
Je voudrais savoir si une licence standard suffit ?
Thanks for reaching out to the Adobe Stock community.
If the products are used for reselling purpose, you will require an Extended license. For more information on the licensing terms and restrictions Of Adobe Stock, please refer to Stock Licensing & terms FAQ: Where can I find the terms and licensing information for Adobe Stock?
When you say that the photo will only be on the site and not physically on the product, are you using the asset for creating banners for the website?
I would like to use adobe image to create a banner presentation for commercial website.
I hope standard configuration licence is ok for that ?
If you are using one leaf(from the Adobe Stock asset) as mentioned above, it is fine to use a standard license.
But just to be sure enough that the use of the standard license is legitimate in this scenario, can you please post a screenshot of the banner you are creating?
- Case 1
I use adobe image with standard licence for category presentation, not directly for the product.
- Case 2
In fact, I suppose, use one leaf for selling product, with standard licence, is not possible, see here : Mitragyna speciosa Red Maeng Da - 50 grammes poudre - Art-ethnobotanique
As I confirmed earlier that if you wish to only use one leaf, it is fine to use a standard license as per your requirements.
Ok, I am a little suprised, about case 2, I can use standard licence to present a product, ok.
It's a good new
As per your requirements, you have stated above(also I have checked the example of your work you have shared above), you may use a standard license.
Merci beaucoup Twarita
You are welcome!