Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Exit
sjlocke215
Contributor
sjlocke215
Contributor
Activity
‎Dec 20, 2017
04:18 AM
You know what it is? it's the && in the if. This works fine: fr = time * 4; sw = Math.sin(fr); if ( sw >=.55) { br = 1 } else br = 0; br; but as soon as I change it to this: fr = time * 4; sw = Math.sin(fr); if ( sw >=.55 && sw < .88) { br = 1 } else br = 0; br; ... it starts having the issues. I think I'm just going to let it run constantly, and move it out to 10000 in the X when I don't need it. See if that works.
... View more
‎Dec 20, 2017
04:00 AM
"It makes no sense to me" The "if" is set up is fine. It's the caching or something that's an error. Heck, take out the checkBx part and it is still not working: introDuration = 1; holdDuration = 1; if (time > introDuration+holdDuration && time < introDuration+holdDuration + .2 ) 0; else 0; Basically, if the time is between X and Y and the checkbox for the effect is on, set the birth rate to Z. If not, set it to 0. So to be even more abstract: if (time > X && time < Y && checkBx ==1 ) Z; else 0; You'll see it not work if you run it once and then modify the "Z" to something new, like 20000 or 0. I got an email that David replied, but I don't see it here. Anyways, he only added curly braces around the "Z" line, and you don't need curly braces in an if when the "then" is just one line. I'll give a look at your sin method though. The birth rate works fine if I keyframe the birthrate instead of using an expression, but I need a way to move that to a point in time as defined by the user who can modify several time based things in the template.
... View more
‎Dec 19, 2017
08:20 PM
I'm having some weird issue with birth rate on CC Particle World. I'm trying to use an expression to turn on and back off the emitter later in my timeline. This is an abstract of the expression. Imagine the checkBx is a slider in the essential graphics window so you can turn the effect on and off. To see the issue, simply make a new comp, make a solid, drop a CCPW on it, and put this for the birth rate. introDuration = 1; holdDuration = 1; checkBx = 1; if ((time > introDuration+holdDuration) && (time < introDuration+holdDuration + .2) && checkBx ==1 ) 11; else 0; I run it once, and it's good. If I want to change a value and run it again I have to edit->purge all to get a good run again. Otherwise I'll get flashing or flickering flames, possibly reflecting the changed values. It's definitely holding on to the cache or something. If I modify a value like the Producer position it forces a refresh. Any ideas? Can anyone else see this issue? Hopefully you have a second to try it out. Thx!
... View more
‎Dec 18, 2017
11:13 AM
Sigh.
... View more
‎Dec 18, 2017
10:06 AM
1 Upvote
I didn't threaten you. It's called an "analogy", whereby I use a similar thing familiar to use and place it into the same context. You can state whatever you like, however, you are incorrect in that you are able to assess what another party emotionally or financially would want ("love the free publicity") whereas the risk involved is just a matter of legal fact, that an IP holder can defend their rights at their choosing. You're mistaking my reply for something more than it is. Sorry.
... View more
‎Dec 18, 2017
07:50 AM
1 Upvote
"they would love the free publicity."The fact is It isn't your place to decide who would "love the free publicity". I could use your photos for free, because you'd "love the free publicity". The fact is that there is a risk to the buyer when you use recognizable objects. It's just a question of how much risk there is.
... View more
‎Dec 13, 2017
11:04 AM
1 Upvote
RayB94553 wrote I'm confused too, I see no "Intellectual Property" in the shot. it's absurd to deem a vehicle on a public roadway as somehow having intellectual property rights. You see cars and trucks and even people on the 6 o'clock news and there is no release sought nor are there any lawsuits. If an image is modified in any way, then the owner of any property or their person that is recognizable, could have claim. You seem to be confusing editorial usage and commercial usage. The image is full of easily discernible vehicles which are a fairly major part of the image. The risk for a buyer using this in commercial use is too high to be licensed. Regarding the church, there is always going to be content like that. It could have been submitted before standards changed. There could be a new law for that country, etc. It's best to just move on. You can submit your boats to the critique forum. It could be an over-saturated area of content, who knows? If images are borderline, they may go either way for acceptance.
... View more
‎Nov 21, 2017
01:56 AM
Easy answer, thanks. Thought I had tried that. Cheers.
... View more
‎Nov 20, 2017
08:05 PM
I'm trying to see how far my text animator is through its animation so I can affect something else. However, when I do this via a pickwhip: end = thisComp.layer("BoxText").text.animator("Animator 1").selector("Range Selector 1").end; ... it's giving me an object, not an actual value. I know this, because I have a text object I'm using to print out values for texting and when I try to toString the "end" value, it's giving me [object Layer]. What I want is the value, like ".33" or something. I'm still a bit of a newb, sorry. Maybe there's a better way to do this. I have a text object that can be multiple lines. Regardless of the number of lines, I want each to slide up into place as a whole, from hiding behind a mask of some sort. So, line 1 slides up into place from under a mask, then line 2 which was invisible slides up under line 1, appearing the same way 1 did, etc. Thx!
... View more
‎Oct 31, 2017
04:11 AM
Learned about "button mode" for the actions menu at MAX. Unfortunately, every time I restart, it reverts to menu mode. I'm not going to waste my time resetting this every start up. Any tips to make it hold?
... View more
‎Sep 18, 2017
12:52 AM
1 Upvote
All of the logos on the shirts.
... View more
‎Sep 06, 2017
09:07 AM
Try putting them on a contextual background. They're just sitting on this splattery fabric for no particular reason. They wouldn't just normally be sitting there like that.
... View more
‎Sep 06, 2017
09:06 AM
1 Upvote
Yep. Try not shooting flowers (which everyone can shoot) and you'll have more success.
... View more
‎Sep 06, 2017
09:05 AM
It's also the logo, but it's just not done very well. You can see the softbox and you can clearly see the camera in the reflection. You've lost definition in parts of the rim as well.
... View more
‎Sep 06, 2017
09:03 AM
1 Upvote
A: Low commercial value. The "background" is odd, and the subject is unlear. 2: You didn't submit it with your watermark in the lower left, did you?
... View more
‎Sep 06, 2017
09:01 AM
2 Upvotes
It's not a bokeh effect. It's just out of focus. A designer can do that with an in focus image.
... View more
‎Aug 01, 2017
09:58 AM
They just look unnaturally untextured across the board. I agree, the cockpit looks weird, but I can't zoom in enough on the image to get a good look.
... View more
‎Jul 31, 2017
06:42 AM
1 Upvote
No idea. I like it a lot. Maybe a little heavy on the clarity/sharpening on the tracks?
... View more
‎Jul 31, 2017
06:41 AM
2 Upvotes
You need to add keywords, releases, categories and then submit.
... View more
‎Jul 30, 2017
08:18 AM
"someplace that it costs a fee to enter, you cannot post anything without a release" Not sure where this idea came from, but it isn't necessarily true.
... View more
‎Jul 29, 2017
07:24 AM
2 Upvotes
"rephrased enough" No, but let me see if I can figure out what you're saying (since it doesn't appear you're asking anything in particular). You're upset because you had five images rejected for various reasons. I don't know if "someone posts two words about it" refers to the rejection reasons, or if you posted something in the critique forum. If you haven't done the latter, then you should try that, if you want to improve your acceptance rate. How you "wanted" an image (underexposed) is irrelevant, if it doesn't make for a marketable stock image. If you just want to vaguely complain more, by all means, do so, but it won't improve your situation.
... View more
‎Jul 29, 2017
04:37 AM
1 Upvote
I like it better. Brought back the overexposed bits.
... View more
‎Jul 28, 2017
08:52 AM
No it isn't. Part of the issue is shooting it at 240mm with a 1/320 shutter.
... View more
‎Jul 28, 2017
07:41 AM
There's nothing in focus in the fish shot. I wouldn't resubmit that.
... View more
‎Jul 28, 2017
07:40 AM
Use your own photos to create it again.
... View more
‎Jul 28, 2017
07:34 AM
It's under exposed, lacks contrast, and is poorly composed. Don't put it smack in the center. Give some surrounding space. This just says "I took a picture of a flower".
... View more
‎Jul 28, 2017
07:25 AM
You may want to rephrase your post in a more clear and concise manner if you want answers to whatever it is you're asking.
... View more
‎Jul 28, 2017
07:23 AM
Most people who submit stock are shooting with the intent of having them uploaded and accepted. When you're just going through old images to see what might make it, you're less likely to have success.
... View more
‎Jun 27, 2017
02:48 PM
This is only on .psd files. .jpgs are relatively quick.
... View more
- « Previous
- Next »
Get ready! An upgraded Adobe Community experience is coming in January.
Learn more
Copyright © 2025 Adobe. All rights reserved.
AdChoices