Simon, I guess I don`t understand. You mean LR is rendering in only 8bit on Windows??? I`m not talking about display, but the internal processing. ... View more

With more and more tools and sliders in LR, the need for floating panels gets bigger and bigger. LR`s UI was okay for version 1 or 2. ... View more

If you guys already think that THIS is flat, you should take a look at the new "design space". I`d be curious, what you think about that one. ... View more

Is there any documentation about OpenGL and Windows 8 etc. and the lack of 10bit support? I couldn`t find anything in the web. ... View more

At the moment, after deleting the one in the Bridge folder, it works. But I will try again later after a OS restart (which I cannot do right now because of another download). Anyway, the "cancel" button does not work. I have to press "esc" to get out of the dialog window. BTW. the installation with Extension manager did not work at all and I got error messages (which I don`t remember exactly). ... View more

I installed it on Win 8.1/Bridge CC/PS CC2015 and had a problem with the last step (step 4), which says: "Place this one item into the Adobe Bridge folder at the following location on your computer: "Program Files (x86)/ Common Files / Adobe / Startup Scripts {Version} / Adobe Photoshop" First off, there is no Bridge folder at this location and I had to generate one. But then, even after I put "photoshop_ximage_processor_pro.jsx" there, it did not work. I still had to put "photoshop_ximage_processor_pro.jsx" into "Program Files (x86)/ Common Files / Adobe / Startup Scripts {Version} / Adobe Photoshop". So this file hast to be in both locations: C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Adobe\Startup Scripts CC\Adobe Photoshop\Adobe Bridge and C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Adobe\Startup Scripts CC\Adobe Photoshop Only then it worked. Putting it out of one of the two locations, and it did not work. ... View more

Yes, please more grids! And let us choose different interpolations algorithms! Warp does not respect Photoshop`s interpolation presets nor does it have an option in the options bar. ... View more

Now that LR 6/CC has been updated, do those of you, who had speed-problems with GPU, still have those problems or did anything improve? ... View more

Please Adobe, fix this! I want to use the secondary display where I want, not where LR wants! ... View more

IMO, you don`t need a powerful GPU at all for LR, if it works correctly. My GTX 970 for example nearly never goes above 10-15% usage. This may change, of course, once the GPU is used for export as well. ... View more

Del_Pierro, I`m glad, it worked for you! ... View more

Victor, can you point me to a site, where I can download a testfile from a Pentax 655Z? I`d really like to test that. What do you mean with "color corrections"? How do you make them, with global slider corrections or locally with the brush? ... View more

Victor, the brush is really a bit slower than without GPU, but still fast enough. I can, however, make it really slow, if I add sharpening or moire to the brush. As already reported in a previous post, I have no UHD monitor, but I`ve spread LR across my 3 monitors for testing (1920x1200 and 2 monitors 1280x1024). Develop sliders, gradients, crop etc .react in realtime. Moving from one picture to another is really fast, so I actually can`t complain. ... View more

Del, I know this won`t help you much, but I also have a GTX 970 and driver 350.12 (Win 8.1). LR6 works perfectly with that card. Did you try to reset driver settings to their default? ... View more

del-pierro, is it also "unusable" with GPU enabled? Was LR 5 faster with the same monitors? ... View more

Do you really think, Lightroom, Capture One and others go the "GPU-route", because they just want to avoid "any real work"? I guess, they would be glad, if they could stick to the CPU-route. GPU just introduces more possibilities for bugs, which are GPU driver related etc. They went the GPU route, because it seems to be the only way, to get a fast onscreen reaction, especially on high-res displays, which will be more common in the future anyway. I have a pretty old (Intel Q6600 and GTX 750Ti) and a very new PC (6core Haswell E and GTX 970). On both machines, the GPU makes the develop module react much faster, actually realtime, even if I spread Lightroom across my 3 monitors (2x19" and a 1920x1200). Much faster than without GPU and much faster than LR 5.x).I even tried large HDR panos and raw files from a 5DS. I admit, that under certain circumstances, the brush may be slow. I admit that after zooming it may take a second to get the picture sharp. But I`m pretty sure, this will get better in the future, because, as Eric said, this is only the beginning. And even at that stage, I prefer the GPU enabled LR6 much to LR5 in terms of speed. And my old PC is for sure not one of the "1% that have top line computers". It would also be helpful, and I do not mean any person in special here, to be as precise as possible in describing what actually is slow. If someone writes "Zooming is slow", what does it mean? Is it stuttering with slow framerates or is it taking time to become sharp? If going from one image to another is slow, what previews do you have, where are they etc.. What GPU/driver you you have? Have you tried other drivers, especially in case of having an AMD card? If brushing is slow, what are your brush settings? Do you brush "exposure", "sharpness" or whatever? Being as precise as possibe will help Adobe find out, what can be improved. ... View more

A question to the people that have speed problems with GPU enabled: Did you try GPU acceleration also with ACR9? What about speed there? ... View more

Victor, have you already tried ACR 9 and if yes, how does it work for you? ... View more

Victor, I tried again with that giant HDR pano file on my 6 core Haswell E: In Lightroom I can only use the develop module on my main monitor, which is 1200x1920px. The brush is rather fast, even if I`m zoomed in. It does slow down very much, if I add noise or remove moire etc. But as long as I only use sliders like exposure, contrast etc. it`s nearly realtime. I then tried the same file on ACR 9, because here I can spread the ACR window over all 3 monitors to get something comparable to a 4K monitor. Same here: the brush is nearly realtime, as long as I don`t add noise etc. to the brush settings. If you can send me a testfile and tell me exactely the brush settings that you use, I can test it on my system. You do have the newest GPU driver (350.12)? Do you have The Quadro AND the Titan in one system? Maybe this is a problem. ... View more

Victor, I just made a pano from 10 HDR files (from a 50D with 15MP). So I got an HDR pano with about 14000x3500 pixels. All sliders that I tried in develop module are realtime. I also tried that file in ACR 9 (spread about 3 monitors, which are about 4000pixels wide in total. Every slider is very smooth! The only "problem" is that if I zoom in, I sometimes have to wait a second or two, before the image gets sharp.This is on my 6-core machine. I`m using a nvidia GTX970 on this machine. It nearly never goes above 20% GPU usage. What I don`t understand is, why Eric said that we shloud have 1 or 2 GB VRAM. VRAM usage never went above 350MB in my tests. At the moment CC lockes me out of both my other machines.... ... View more

Victor, I used files from a 7D Mark2 with 20MP. At the moment I cannot test other files, because the Adobe Cloud doesn`t let me sign in on my Surface pro, although I`ve signed out on my other machines...... ... View more

I´ve tested LR CC on 3 different machines: Surface Pro (version1), WIN7 PC (Intel Q6600, GTX 750), WIN 8.1 (6-core Haswell-E, GTX 970) and my experience is the same in all 3 cases: The develop module reacts MUCH faster with GPU turned on. Sliders react in realtime. Zooming and panning is absolutely smooth. Brush may be a bit slower, but no problem for me. And since this GPU implemetation is only a first step, LR will get faster and faster in future releases. BTW. my main display is 1920x1200px. I`ve also tested ACR 9 and just for testing I expanded it over all my 3 monitors. The difference in speed is like night and day in this scenario. With GPU on I still get realtime interaction, when using sliders or zooming. We should also not forget that most people that come to a forum are the ones with problems. The others don`t have a reason to come here. ... View more

LR6 should really have an improved zooming! ACR9 and Photoshop have scrubby zoom etc. Please add that to LR! ... View more

Chris, if a 16bit image is only displayed with 8bit/channel, AT LEAST some kind of information/warning should be displayed! And, of course, 16bit/channel should be supported in all zoom levels. BTW. (and this may be off-topic), there should be a more realistic display of layer-styles at zoom levels below 100%. Depending on the style, the difference to 100% view can be rather extreme. ... View more

Why don`t you use the new radial filter in ACR for off-center vignettes? ... View more

Chris, if doing the actual Raw conversion by the GPU is so complicated, would it be as complicated to only do the image display with the help of the GPU? So that we can get the smooth and fast image display that Photoshop offers with all the goodies like flick-panning, animated zoom, birds eye view, rotation etc? IMO the whole image navigation in LR and ACR are really bad and slow compared to Photoshop. ... View more

".....and making Lightroom/ACR efficient on the GPU isn't nearly as easy as it sounds." I can imagine that Chris, but.....: "We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things. Not because they are easy, but because they are hard" 🙂 ... View more

Actually the radial filter should be implemented in the blur gallery (like all other blur filters, as well)! ... View more

Zooming in LR is really cumbersome since LR1. If you compare it to Photoshop`s zooming and panning, LR`s method is REALLY bad! I want to be able to constantly zoom to any level, not just back and forth between 2 options or use a slider. I want PS`s animated zoom (scrubby zoom) and flick-panning. LR`s method is as bad as one can imagine! ... View more

Jeffrrey, the new blur gallery UI is great! Please give this UI to ACR as well!!! ... View more