Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi!
We're about to mix our film in 5.1 surround. I've done a bit of 5.1 mixing in Premiere and Audition and we tested it in a local theater and it sounded great but with only a 2.1 setup currently it was a lot of guessing and testing at the local theater. They were super nice to let me do that. But now I'm setting up my office to edit in 5.1 surround. I need to purchase speakers and the interface or controller to route all those speakers into and I'd love some advice. My office is 8' x 16' and has acoustic panels and
The speakers I was looking at picking up were:
5 x JBL LSR305 MKII Speakers ($99/each)
JBL 310s Sub
But what's a solid interface/controller option for less than $500 to run all those speakers into?
Focusrite 18i20 3rd Gen?
SPL SMC 2489? (I found one for a great price)
I'm not sure which of the above controllers is better. Does anyone here know?
Eventhough 90% of the time we'll just be editing stereo mixes for video, I'd love to be set and ready for all 5.1 mixes as well. Thoughts?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I moved this to the Video Hardware forum, hoping that you will get a better response.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I like Focusrite a lot
The SPL looks pricy and it's less feature rich, even if it does have a nice knob
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
When you say the focusrite is more feature rich, what do you mean? I'm talking specifically for 5.1 surround mixing.
(The SPL I've found for $450. Even being that price, is it still not as good as the much newer 18i20?)
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
You could use the focusrite for a bunch of other things in addition to running the 5.1 monitoring. It's got 18 inputs and 20 outputs, and you only need like 6 outputs. That's a 18x12 audio interface you're left with.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
First off, thanks for your replies. That makes sense. I just read somewhere that the SPL had features that are really convenient when editing 5.1 but I wasn't sure of the focusrite had them too. I feel like I don't know what I'd want/prefer until I start editing something. I forget what those features are, maybe easy channel isolation? I can't remember.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
THREE QUESTIONS...
So with the SPL SMC...do I still need an audio interface? I'm thinking I may have been confused and thought the SPL SMC 2489 could serve as the audio interface AND controller. But I think I'll still need to get the streams from Audition to an interface first before I send that to something like an SPL SMC.
Oh, how I could use some help here.
Again, I'm not looking to do any recording, only mixing in Audition and monitoring with 6 JBL speakers.
My second part that I don't know is...if I still had to get an audio interface, and I need 6 dedicated outputs, then with focusrite, the 18i20 is really my only option I think. Will I notice any difference if I used a 2nd gen vs 3rd gen? Only thing I can see being useful is the TB support. But is there any noticable difference in latency/lag when editing 5.1 surround with TB vs. USB 2.0 (focusrite 3rd gen vs. 2nd gen)
And finally...
If I haven't lost you already...
When I'm all done and I want to do a stereo fold down to hear what it'll sound like in stereo speakers only...does the SPL SMC do that with a push of a button? Or will I really want to do an actual fold down using Audition and then hit play and it'll route the mix to only my L and R speakers?
Not sure if this forum was the best place for these questions or if I should've asked this in the Audition forum...but here it is anyway. Help would be immensely appreciated.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I think you need to call up the sales people at SPL and ask some of those questions.
On a PC, often USB 2.0 is preferable to Thunderbolt. It depends on your motherboard.
On Mac, especially the new ones, DO NOT use USB 2.0 audio hardware: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpVNkglXc84
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thanks again for your response. I'm running a PC. I'm about to purchase a new supped up PC. So the Mac thing doesn't relate. SPL is a german company AFAIK and the device is so many years old that I avoided calling their support (if they even have a contact number...in germany). I'm surprised you said USB 2.0 is preferable to Thunderbold connections. The new PC motherboards that I'd be getting all have USB-C ports on the MB so I figured that would be best. But again, if USB 2.0 isn't any worse then I could conceivably get a less expensive Audio Interface for 5.1 mixing. Again, I'm NOT using this for audio recording. Only mixing.
Hmmmm...
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Driver support for Thunderbolt and USB-C is terrible. If you don't need the bandwith, USB 2.0 is much cheaper and easier.
I did a bit of research on the SMC, and it does not appear to be a DAC. It would not work for this purpose.