Betreff: Мандаринка на білому фоні

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Jan 19, 2023

Besides the wrong white balance, it is badly focused. The edges are partly frayed and there is a hair on the left side. in 200% view

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Dec 13, 2022

In addition to what the others said: It lacks sharpness.

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Dec 08, 2022

What reason did Adobe give? I suspect technical issues. 1st pic: There are colour fringes, partially underexposed, too little contrast.

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Dec 02, 2022

I think the focus area is too narrow. Large parts are not in focus. The tonal distribution is OK.

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Dec 02, 2022

In Photoshop gibt es dazu keine Einstellung. Vielleicht hat die Software, mit der das Video aufgezeichnet wurde, eine Funktion, mit der der Cursor so dargestellt wird.

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Dec 02, 2022

The vertical perspective must be aligned straight. I suspect that you have not uploaded the original size here. The image is very small to asses everything well, but apparently it's quite blurry.

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Dec 02, 2022

Please add what Adobe has written as a reason for rejection so that we can answer in detail.

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Dec 02, 2022

in addition to what Henrik has written: there is an extreme amount of noise in the pictures.

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Nov 22, 2022

It is blurred. You can sharpen it, but large areas of the photo remain without detail.

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Nov 14, 2022

Welche allgemeine Begründung wurde denn genannt?

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Nov 09, 2022

I think it was rejected because there is nothing in focus.

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Nov 05, 2022

The photo is too small to say anything about it. Please post the original size.

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Oct 30, 2022

I also see no obvious technical reasons for rejection, but would reduce a little magenta from image two and three.

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Oct 29, 2022

Super, das freut mich!

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Oct 29, 2022

Auf meinem Mac mit MacOs 11.7 funktioniert nach dem Update auf 12.01 alles bestens. Arbeitest du auf Windows? Eventuell könnte ein Update des Grafikkarten-Treibers helfen.

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Oct 13, 2022

Some reasons are: Color fringing (I have never seen such wide color fringing), JPEG artifacts, missing details, color noise, oversaturated.

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Oct 08, 2022

We had a similar question recently. Here are the answers: https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock-discussions/standard-licence-terms-for-book-use/td-p/13250604

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Oct 07, 2022

Yes, that is correct. As it says in the licence conditions: "Most Adobe Stock photos, vectors, and illustrations come with a Standard license. With a Standard license, you may: Reproduce up to 500,000 copies of the asset in all media, including product packaging, printed marketing materials, digital documents, or software."

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Oct 07, 2022

It is too dark and poorly focused

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Sep 29, 2022

I would lighten the dark areas a bit and upload it again.

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Sep 29, 2022

Ich schließe mich der meinung von ricky336 an. Das Motiv Mohnblüte finde ich klasse, aber der Beschnitt der Blütenblätter macht es unvollkommen.

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Sep 11, 2022

The example image is a JPEG, nowhere does it say that it is a vector image. You can use the filter "Vectors" for your search and then download a file as EPS or Illustrator file.

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Sep 07, 2022

Adobe always gives a general reason for rejection. Which reason was given?

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Sep 07, 2022

Adobe always gives a general reason for rejection. My guess is that they were rejected because of technical problems. The first three photos are very dark. In some of them the depth of field is too shallow.

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Aug 19, 2022

Klick on "Settings" and choose "Always download vector file type"

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Aug 16, 2022

I think it's the leaning verticals. The distortion is too extreme.

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Aug 11, 2022

Versuch es mal mit dieser Anleitung: https://helpx.adobe.com/de/manage-account/using/update-billing-information.html

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Aug 03, 2022

It works for me, just like in the previous version.

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Jul 31, 2022

I looked at the first two images. It is already noticeable at a view of 100% that hardly any details can be seen. At 200% it becomes quite clear. In addition, the highlights are blown out in the 2nd image. (Screenhot at 200%): Screenhot at 200%

Marianne-Deiters · ‎Jul 30, 2022

They are not focused very well. Bumblebee is slightly better, but not completely in focus. Also the highlights are blown out.

Marianne-Deiters

Marianne-Deiters

Activity

Betreff: Мандаринка на білому фоні

Betreff: Hello. I'm a beginner, so please explain ...

Betreff: Beginner here.. Any tips?

Betreff: Buenas, necesito vuestra ayuda.

Betreff: Pinselspitzen in Neonfarben anzeigen

Betreff: Reason For Rejecting My Image

Betreff: Buenas, necesito vuestra ayuda.

Betreff: Quality problems

Betreff: Why was this photo rejected

Betreff: Textur Bilder nicht angenommen

Betreff: Find out why my photos are rejected

Betreff: I would like to learn more. What´s wrong ...

Betreff: Photos rejected without any obvious flaws

Betreff: Fehler bei der Erstellung von Masken

Betreff: Fehler bei der Erstellung von Masken

Betreff: Too much noise???

Betreff: Does Standard licence cover a small book ...

Betreff: Standard licence terms for book use?

Betreff: I would like to know the reason for the r...

Betreff: PROBLÈMES DE QUALITÉ ?

Betreff: Foto abgelehnt

Betreff: Downloads are blurry and pixelated

Betreff: POR QUE ME RECHAZAN LA FOTO

Betreff: Adobe Stocks pictures rejected

Betreff: vector Items in Stock download as JPGs. H...

Betreff: photo rejetée pour problèmes de qualité

Betreff: Adressdaten auf Rechnungen ändern.

Betreff: 2022 Photoshop layer problems!

Betreff: Please help me to know, what's wrong with...

Betreff: je ne comprend pas ces deux refus