P: Generated images violate user guidelines

The neural filter "Depth Blur" has been in beta since, if I recall, 2021. Live Gausian fill was once in beta, then introduced in Adobe Photoshop proper, and has since been removed even from the beta version of Photoshop. Apple's operating systems, beginning with Developers and progressing to public betas last nearly a year before being introduced to the general public. It's a long and painstaking process and 3 or 4 months is a very short time in comparison.

@zvi_t but it is a beta, meaning this is all on a voluntary basis and by definition is a work in progress. No one is forcing anyone to participate. Honestly three months to develop something as complex and nuanced as an AI interface in such a robust imaging software package is short-term IMO. Expecting Adobe to be able to roll out something that is this complicated in such a short time is rediculous.

This post titled "Generated Images Violate User Guidelines" was published on May 23, 2023. It's been three months and 43 pages of discussion, yet there have been no changes regarding these incorrect warnings. People can only be patient with the "beta" excuse for so long.

As with any Beta, it will continue to improve with user feedback and constructive input. Thanks!

@Kevin Stohlmeyer  Thanks for the suggestion, and sorry for the outburst. Yes, I'm struggling with "closed hand" which gives me all kinds of open hands, which I then have to fix part by part to close them.

Closed fingers is also something that's better, but it would be much easier to just being able to write fist.

@zvi_t first, thank you for being a tester in this beta. Second, I've found it helpful to Google synonyms for violating terms. Instead of "fist" why not try "closed hand"?

Baby fist. Baby fist hand. Baby's hand like a fist.  VIOLATION for any way I use the word "fist."

1. I do not want a fist punching anyone!

2. I do not want a fist killing anyone!

3. I do not want a fist committing a crime!

Al I want is a fist of a baby!!!! How long will it be until Adobe fixes this ridiculous issue?

Do a google image search for smoke with transparent background, simply save the pic, copy & paste into your image.

I've been trying to add a fringe (what we in the UK call them - in the US it's 'bangs' I think) to a woman's hair. I've tried in the web version of text to image, then tried in the web version of generative fill, and now I'm using PS Beta 25.0.

If I select the forehead and ask for 'fringe' it gives me all sorts of weird ornaments, straps, bows and indecipherable things, but if I ask for 'bangs' it gets blocked as a violation! Not my fault the US decided to call a part of a hairstyle 'bangs' (no logic to that name that I can see whatsoever). Bangs is either violent as a gun or bomb 'bangs' or is sexual in Adobe's mind it would seem, and not possibly used in any other innocent context.

I've tried 'hair fringe', 'hair bangs', 'straight bangs' and more - only the words using bangs has something resembling hair and not objects, but they are usually parted and don't cover the forehead.

This is going to be confusing and unintuitive as heck if words don't give an obvious result (I'd say it should be obvious if the AI is smart enough to recognise that the area I've selected is on someone's head at least, and surrounded by hair) or the words we need to use are getting blocked because they can also be used in an 'inappropriate' context. 

Solution: don't block so many words. 

Better solution: don't block anything and let people create what they want and then they can later suffer the potential consequences with wherever they use the image next - just as they would with painting, drawing, sclupting, photography or any other form of art that springs to mind.

Red, try using swimming costume instead of swimwear. Works for me