Skip to main content
Participant
August 26, 2022
Open for Voting

Nudity and other issues which appear to violate Adobe Generative AI Guidelines [merged thread]

  • August 26, 2022
  • 184 replies
  • 120447 views

Hello Adobe and its collective users

I am writing to you not only as a devoted user of Adobe’s suite of creative tools but also as a professional photographer whose work has been recognized and displayed in museum settings. My specialization in classic nudes has allowed me to explore the human form in a manner that celebrates beauty, form, and artistic expression. However, I have encountered a significant challenge with the AI restrictions placed on editing images that contain nudity, even when such images are created within a professional, artistic context.

 

As an artist whose work often involves nuanced and sensitive subjects, I understand and respect the complexities of creating ethical AI tools that serve a wide user base. However, the current limitations significantly impact my creative process and professional workflow, particularly when it comes to editing backgrounds for nude or semi-nude images. These restrictions not only prolong my work but also inhibit my artistic expression, compelling me to seek alternative solutions that may not offer the same level of quality and integration as Adobe’s products.

 

I propose the consideration of the following points, which I believe could benefit both Adobe and its professional users:

 

Artistic Integrity and Professional Use: Recognition of the professional and artistic context in which tools are used can help differentiate between content that is genuinely creative and that which the restrictions aim to prevent.

 

Ethical Use Policy: An ethical use policy that accommodates professional artists and photographers, possibly through a verification process, ensuring that our work is not unduly censored while maintaining legal and ethical standards.

 

Custom Solutions for Professionals: The development of specialized software versions that allow more flexibility for editing sensitive content, with appropriate safeguards to prevent misuse.

 

Feedback and Advisory Panel: Establishing a panel of professionals from the art and photography community to provide ongoing feedback and insights on how Adobe’s tools can better serve creative professionals.

 

Transparent Guidelines: The creation of clear, transparent guidelines that navigate the legal and ethical landscape, especially regarding sensitive content, to ensure users can understand and comply with Adobe’s policies.

 

I am fully committed to engaging in a constructive dialogue and am willing to be part of a solution that respects both the creative needs of artists and the ethical considerations of digital content. I believe that by working together, we can find a balanced approach that supports artistic expression while adhering to shared values and responsibilities.

 

Thank you for considering my perspective on this matter. I am hopeful for an opportunity to discuss this further and explore how we can make Adobe’s tools even more inclusive and accommodating for professional artists and photographers.    Steven Williams 

184 replies

Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Community Expert
April 9, 2025

@Phil34542109ukyf,

 

Adobe isn't likely to change their Terms of Use policies. If you want to create adult content, use another approach. Find an AI service that allows adult content creation (I don't know of any).  Or get an AI app on a private platform, to which only you have access.

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
nicmart
Inspiring
April 9, 2025
It’s NOT just adult content. Adobe censors fully clothed women who are buxom. It has a long list of forbidden things to generate, such as bathing suit and gun. It’s the more strict artistic censorship in American history.
Participant
April 7, 2025

Yout BLOCKING creative adult content images whil other programs allow it. Put a waiver up to sign to let us adult artist creat some cool images to sell online im some cases something slips by such as a womans chest God forbid you let us see womans chest on here hey we are adults and you can block kids from creating nip by simply verifying our age ..... oth programs allow it please consider it thanks even Photoshop blocks eciting of a image created in Firefly that may show some skin hey WAKE up it's NOT real skin OMG DISPOINTED in your blocking content 

Participant
April 2, 2025

The AI behind the text to photo needs to be so "woke" as it create images that are both culturally offensive and inappropriate.  The request of traditional Arabic women dressed in traditional Muslim gowns or historically accurate Turkish costumes should not include by default, men with beards crossdressing.  It should also be sensitive to the actual historical appearance of these individuals and not try to be multi-cultural to the point where 75% of images are inappropriate to the request.  This wastes time and resources, making Firefly nearly unusable for anyone on a deadline.  

Kartika Rawat
Community Manager
Community Manager
April 2, 2025

Your insights are valuable; we'll share them with the team. You can refer to a similar discussion: https://adobe.ly/4liAyUo

 

I hope this helps. Thank you for your feedback on Adobe Firefly.

KR

Participant
March 25, 2025

Rubbish. "Deep fakes"  Nothing deep about them.

Next you'll be wanting to ban paint brushes and artists paper.  [removed]

Inspiring
February 22, 2025

It's interesting that the same image got different reactions from Photopshop. The word "kitchen" was fine. "Bedroom," not so so much.

There are far bigger issues in the world than this silliness. Still, it's worth a thought or two.

droopydog500
Community Manager
Community Manager
February 18, 2025

Please keep the discussions focused on Adobe Firefly, not general political discussions.

 

Thanks,

    droopy, Moderator

Adobe Community Expert (not an Adobe employee)
Participant
February 16, 2025

Hello dear Adobe,

Guys, are you planning to reconsider the overly strict censorship in Adobe Firefly? A completely decent photo of a girl in a swimsuit—are these p***graphic materials or too much nudity? Seriously? Have you been to the beach or pool recently? The censorship can even target regular summer tops where a woman's stomach is exposed...


"Cartoon superhero duck wearing a dramatic cape and mask, holding a toy gun in a heroic pose"—what's wrong here? Violence? Cruelty? Guys, a duck holding a toy gun is a theme from a children's cartoon for kids aged 6 and up...

Adobe, you have always made your software primarily for professionals who need to accomplish a variety of tasks. But the overly strict censorship of your AI greatly limits the ability to perform these tasks. I mostly create materials for a lingerie store (not a p*** studio), and I cannot always use Adobe AI capabilities.

Some people, believe it or not, need to use "gun" in their work not to promote violence.

I understand that without strict censorship some people will use AI for not the best purposes. Perhaps there are no other ways yet to teach a neural network what is good and what is bad. But you can maintain strict censorship in projects aimed at a wide audience (Adobe Firefly and Adobe Express web resources) while significantly simplifying it for professional software users from the Creative Cloud package.

Participant
February 16, 2025

Understand me correctly, I do not want to offend anyone's religious feelings with this image. But this method really works!

Is this correct? Is this how professionals should work in professional software?



Known Participant
February 16, 2025

"Adobe isn’t concerned about people making offensive issues they are concerned that their poorly programmed, loose-cannon software will create a pornographic image when a kid is trying to change a picture of a bug."

 

Except that if I try fantasy generations with women (for D&D character images, for example) they end up being over sexualized in skimpy clothing with obvious surgical "enhancements." I have a hard time getting Adobe to generate family friendly or non-sexist female illustrations, resulting in me having to specify "wearing loose pants and a long sleeve shirt that covers entire torso.." and even then over half of the generated images don't follow the prompts and I end up with a mini skirt and a crop top. If a woman wants to wear that or generate that then great, but if I want to make an image for a 12 year old friend of my son and she wants an image of her Elf Ranger for D&D it is a pain. It is literally the worst of both worlds. You can't create a "no guns" sign for a public building, but you also end up with inappropriate stuff when you don't want it.

Participating Frequently
February 15, 2025

Considering it is Adobe AI and one of the industry's leaders, it shows how poorly they have trained the AI if it can't differentiate between red marks on a shirt or blood. Or they have the filters cranked up way beyond what they have listed in the TOS.

Inspiring
February 13, 2025

Indeed !