P:I lose too many credits doing trial and error. The monthly cost should be based on downloads

Still, they’re pretty bad. Google pro seems to have it down the best. But chews through credits as a partner model. . 

the issue is that there’s still no feedback to recover credits in exchange for error reporrting / training data. Flagging the issues - asking for credit refunds - just goes unanswered. 

Just the other day I had a ton of errors, just doesnt seem fair to include the credits in a subscription, and then when the models have high error rates. Just have no way for users to request for credit back. 

I believe you

Djsmartberry

Thank you for the updated. Voted on Bori's Idea. I believe it is reasonable. 

you mean it isnt? WTF - I'm paying to the software's screw ups? twisted, mangled hands and distorted ape-like faces?

Hi Brett5ED9!

Thanks for your feedback! We know how frustrating it is when a generation turns out unusable, like a face missing half its features. I'm merging your thread here since it’s part of a similar discussion. Please add you vote here

When a generation is BAD and unusable, like a human that has half the face missing, and you can tell with cookies that we did NOT download it, we should get those generation credits back!

Agreed, if it generates something I'm not going to use or download there should be a reduced rate. 

I understand that creating images just to see what can be created is a drain on your servers.  So, limiting charges to just downloads would not be fair to Adobe.  However, when I ask over and over for the video to NOT ZOOM, but have movement, left to right... and it ZOOMS.  Then I set camera to "Static" it ZOOMS.  I set camera pan left to right and it ZOOMS.  I have left "thumbs down" over and over again.  When the generation fails to follow simple instructions, we should not be charged.  Also, as others mentioned, if error messages prevent getting the file to download, you should not charge for those attempts, either.