Skip to main content
Participant
March 23, 2023
Open for Voting

P: Show words omitted from prompt or violates content guidelines

  • March 23, 2023
  • 129 replies
  • 39133 views

Tried to make a word in colorful teddy plush but it says me it is against the guidelines. 

So I tried to say fur instead. That worked but didn't give me the result I wanted. 

129 replies

junction125
Participant
January 8, 2025

I am sick of the monkey telling me I am using words AI won't allow. You can use "George Washington" but you can't use "Donald Trump"? 

Kartika Rawat
Community Manager
Community Manager
January 8, 2025

Hi junction125!

Thanks for writing in. Please review user guidelines here: https://adobe.ly/3DIxxLR

 

Let us know if you have any questions.

KR

Participating Frequently
January 7, 2025

The content restriction algorithm in Firefly desperately needs some tweaks, because half the time it's unusable. It wouldn't even let me show someone kneeling in a completely innocent context. I have to go elsewhere for AI generated images most of the time.

@mj
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 3, 2024

Agreed

Participant
December 3, 2024

Instead of just flagging words, flag contextual meaning of the words. AI should be able to determine from a prompt that "shooting" in the context of a "photograph" or "bleeding" in the context of "colors" are not a problem.

jane-e
Community Expert
Community Expert
September 9, 2024

 

@TheChunkyMonkey wrote: "Just wondering why Pepe the frog is a word that violates the guidelines? Is pepe a bad word? "

 

 

Here are the user guidelines for using Adobe Generative AI:

https://www.adobe.com/legal/licenses-terms/adobe-gen-ai-user-guidelines.html

 

Note Section 4:

 

4. Be Respectful of Third-Party Rights

Using Adobe’s generative AI features to create, upload, or share content that violates third-party copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity, or other rights is prohibited. This may include, but is not limited to, entering text prompts designed to generate copyrighted, trademarked, or otherwise infringing content, uploading an input or reference image that includes a third party’s copyrighted content, generating text that plagiarizes third-party content, or using a third party’s personal information in violation of their privacy or data protection rights. If you’re not sure whether your content violates the rights of a third party, you may want to reach out to an attorney or consult publicly available reference materials at the following:

 

Pepe the Frog is not allowed because it is copyrighted by Matt Furie, the creator.

 

"In June 2019, Furie received a $15,000 out of court settlement in a copyright infringement case against Infowars and Alex Jones concerning unlicensed use of the image of Pepe the Frog on far-right themed posters. Furie stated that he would continue to 'enforce his copyrights aggressively to make sure nobody else is profiting off associating Pepe the Frog with hateful imagery.' "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepe_the_Frog

 

Jane

 

 

TheChunkyMonkey
Participating Frequently
September 9, 2024

Just use Dall-E save yourself the headache. Stopped using woke Firefly months ago. However you can find work arounds to get it to work. I can get firefly to generate nude women so they not as smart as they think. 

Participant
September 8, 2024

You are absolutely right. When I try text to image generative A.I., I can't
even say "sexy woman" without it being rejected. It is also hopelessly
P.C. I asked for brick layers for the 1666 London Fire restoration, and
they had one black man, one Asian woman and one white woman laying bricks.
I think they have some kind of quota system. I would like to try to have it
do a group of sperm donors and see how many women they put in....except the
word 'sperm' wouldn't get past the censors.

*Sincerely yours,*

*Steve *

*Steven W Rodgers*

 

 

(weblinks removed by moderator)

 

 

 

Participating Frequently
September 8, 2024

Let's face it, Firefly has a lot of problems including those surrounding their "woke" programmers who decide certain words have the connotation THEY use. One wonders if they even speak English and realize many words have more than one meaning. I am frequently dissatisfied with results when I ask for artwork in a certain style or to imitate a certain artist. Cannot do people at all, inevitably when asking for blond hair the skin color and features are hardly European are dark to black. Firefly is far behind other AI generators...too bad, really. It would be useful for those of us who use Adobe products like PS and AI.

jane-e
Community Expert
Community Expert
September 8, 2024

 

@Rishi Ed wrote: even something as simple as "Dumb people reading" gets rejected

 

I'm glad to hear that Firefly rejected the word "dumb", as it gives the message that a disability makes a person flawed or “less than” — that disability is bad, negative, or something that needs to be fixed.

 

See this post from the Harvard Business Review if you are interested in learning more:

https://hbr.org/2020/12/why-you-need-to-stop-using-these-words-and-phrases

 

Jane

 

Participant
September 8, 2024

Not sure who you represent - Jane. I hope it's not adobe. I grew up with
"Dick and Jane" books. Perhaps you are also aware of the studies that some
names are positioned for failure?

It's a freedom of speech issue. Honestly, I don't care what Adobe "bad
words" are. I am asking for their list to decrease "mistakes" in prompts.



[self-promotion web links removed by moderator]

 


Thank you.

Participant
September 8, 2024

Please provide a list of "bad" words that Adobe doesn't like. The list must be extensive because even something as simple as "Dumb people reading" gets rejected. Countless other examples have occurred. I have to craft work around descriptions almost every time I use Firefly. Regarding the mentioned prompt, I was hoping for something cartoonish and funny. AI has no sense of humor. Please fix.