Skip to main content
Participant
March 23, 2023
Open for Voting

P: Show words omitted from prompt or violates content guidelines

  • March 23, 2023
  • 129 replies
  • 39133 views

Tried to make a word in colorful teddy plush but it says me it is against the guidelines. 

So I tried to say fur instead. That worked but didn't give me the result I wanted. 

129 replies

Participant
May 25, 2024

one of the MANY problems with adobe AI,  not only are they incredibly restrictive, but they are extremely inconsistent .

droopydog500
Community Manager
Community Manager
May 25, 2024

Hi @Javier37626234p7x6,

 

Can you please share your full prompt or a screen shot?  The word "bread" is not blocked for me:

full loaf of white bread 

 

Thanks,

    droopy

Adobe Community Expert (not an Adobe employee)
Participant
May 25, 2024

I got censored typing "bread". Adobe should not do anything other than implement age verification. Incredible the power of generative AI that does not draw bread so as not to hurt our sensitivity. My 5 year old son draws bread and if you ask him he will surely draw you a knife, but Adobe Firefly doesn't do it to protect us... Thanks Adobe

@mj
Community Expert
Community Expert
March 28, 2024

Here's a strange one. My initial prompt generated a result. Then I chose one of the options I liked and tried to create additional gens based on that one.

 

I got the Oops monkey man saying I was being naughty. 😞

 

Happen to anybody else? Do we know why that might happen?

 

Best

mj

Participant
March 28, 2024

Unfortunately , in addition to their canned response "our goal is to provide a safe ......" Adobe has already come right out and said that they refuse to tell us what the restricted words are and that they will not do so in the future. Their reason being that if we knew the restricted words that we would find other ways to say it in order to get the results that we want. $60 a month subscription, another 50 if I wanted substance 3d, and of course I'm the silly one because I think I should get the results I want instead of the ones Adobe says I'm allowed to have.

Participant
March 27, 2024

yes, I'm a bit embarrassed by my typos, but it still was worth showing how little Adobe cares, not to mention how little they pay attention.  Hey you just said you will no longer support our company, do you want to buy something else from us?


 

Participant
March 25, 2024

Many, many of us are right on that line. Adobe has gone completely insane. They should be sued by their shareholders because of exactly what you describe. Censorship taken to the point of clinical insanity. Adobe doubled its price but now hurts us financially due to ramptant, illogical wokeism. It's amazing. The stupidity is the stuff of legends.

Participant
March 25, 2024

No, it helps not at all. If it's in Websters, the word is fair game. It's part of the English language. If woke Adobe wants to create some new language that it thinks it can persuade people to use, go for it. Otherwise, let us use the language we've used for a thousand years.

Participant
March 18, 2024

It is absolutely amazing how woke Adobe is and how much control they choose to have over artistic expression.  Art has often been offensive. Expression is not about making sure everyone about you is comfortable.  What makes it even worse is having the leash so tight that we can't even do innocuous things.  Another example.  I wanted to do a piece with a Shogun in a dramatic, dynamic pose, with the bushido code in the background and random blood splatters on the background, and EXTREMELY common motiff in that genre of art.  We won't even focus on the fact that for some reason, adobe doesn't like it's AI to generate feet, unless you specify feet and then you still get a portrait with a foot growing out of someone's shoulder... But anyway, Shogun was a no go!  I'm sure because it has the word GUN in it. Blood was not allowed. And for some reason, BUSHIDO was not allowed!  Come on, and the best Adobe does is give us a canned response "thank you for your suggestion. our goal is to provide a safe and enjoyable .......blah blah blah...use the thumbs.... blah blah blah"  Guess what, it's NOT enjoyable.  It's hard enough to get an image just the way you want it without the censorship. This just makes it ridiculous from a workflow standpoint let alone the principle of being stifled. 

Participating Frequently
March 17, 2024

"Safe" environment? What are we two year olds? We are attempting to make art, here, not be censored by malcontents behind the scenes. Maybe "words" trigger you, but the rest of us are just looking at them as images in an art piece. I believe Adobe and its behind the scenes operators and moderators should have the respect and courtesy to publish a list of prohibited terms up front and proudly. Then we users can know exactly what we can and cannot do on Firefly. Thank you.