Skip to main content
Participant
Jan 27, 2012 4:42 AM UTC
Open for Voting

P: Ability to invert negative scans to positives (color and black-and-white)

I would dearly like to see the Lightroom 4 Beta team implement an additional feature in the final release. That feature would be the ability to take a camera+macro lens image of a B&W negative -- essentially a camera-based scan of a negative -- and invert the negative image to a positive image at the beginning of the development process in such a way that the resulting sliders in the LR4 Develop Module would not operate in reverse. As I understand it, this capability exists in Photoshop, but I don't own Photoshop. I do own Photoshop Elements 9, but that program only supports an 8-bit workflow, not 16-bits per channel, and round-tripping between LR & PSE9 requires the reimportation of a TIFF file that is more than twice the size of my NEF RAW files. Since this programming wizardry already exists in Photoshop, I would think that it would be a relatively simple matter to transfer and adapt that code for LR4 -- but then, I'm not a programmer, so what do I know...

I've been digitizing 40-year-old Kodachrome slides from my Peace Corps days in Africa, using a 55mm Micro-Nikkor (macro) lens, coupled to a Nikon ES-1 Slide Copy Attachment, and even on a D300s body, I can get truly excellent results. I can't wait to continue that work using the pending 36 megapixel Nikon D800 body with an upgraded f/2.8 macro lens (mine is the old 55mm f/3.5 design). I really, REALLY want to be able to camera-scan my many B&W negatives without having to generate huge intermediate TIFF files.

You can respond to this request by emailing me, Jeff Kennedy Thanks, in advance, for taking the time to review and consider my request. I LOVE Lightroom 3, and from what I've seen, I'm going to love LR4 even more. I REALLY appreciate the effort that Adobe takes to solicit input from the photographic user community.

BTW, if the feature I request *can't* be implemented right away, could the LR support team provide detailed, interim instructions as to how to use the "backwards" sliders, and in what sequence? That would be very much appreciated. I'm sure many older LR users have considerable analog image collections that they would like to digitize, and doing so in-camera is both 1) of surprisingly high quality, 2) MUCH faster than using flatbed scanners and 3) of much higher quality and resolution than flatbed scan and MUCH cheaper than professional drum scans.

180 replies

Inspiring
May 26, 2018 11:41 AM UTC
It’s great that the new profile structure opens another door for this task.

But in all other ways I no longer hold my breath for any implementation of inverting images (besides the curve trick we all use). Why?

After one year Adobe still hasn’t made LR compatible with HEIF / HEIC image format - the format produced by the most used camera on the planet (iPhone).

That should make clear how low on the scale a wish from a group as small as us here is.

If inverting is ever implemented, I’ll be happy. But I’ve stopped waiting a long time ago..
Translate
Inspiring
May 26, 2018 2:05 AM UTC
Todd,
Thanks for trying them out, but as I suspected, these profiles are specific to the negative scan process. I think you will find that the profiles produce much better and more consistent results if you create them yourself from your own negatives. After going through the process a couple of times, it is very quick and easy. And once created, those profiles will work for every roll of that film stock scanned under the same conditions.

Also, you cannot auto white balance on the inverted negative. It seems like it should work, but the Adobe SDK on profiles said that the profiles are applied at the end of the image rendering process, so the white balance tool is still seeing the non-inverted image.
Translate
Todd Shaner
Legend
May 25, 2018 11:25 PM UTC
Jeff, thanks for sharing this information. I was able to get a reasonable image rendering using your Portra 400 profiles with various color negative films. However, it required making some extreme Tone adjustments to remove excessive highllght and shadow clipping. Also the LR WB eyedropper doesn't work properly when clicked on neutral color areas. I had to adjust the WB controls manually. My film capture setup uses a 5500K color temperature Canon Speedlite and Canon 5D MKII and 600D cameras. Not sure if your profiles are camera model dependent, but if so that would explain what I'm seeing.
LUT based profiles are definitely a step in the right direction. Hopefully Adobe will also pick up the ball and implement a raw file invert function to fix the backwards control operation.
Translate
Inspiring
May 25, 2018 4:11 PM UTC
Here are a couple of sample profiles created using Portra400 outdoors. I am doubtful that these will work for someone else because I think the LUT will be dependent on your particular scanning setup, but it will be interesting to see what happens. For my test, I was able to use one of these 2 profiles to color correct about 90% of the images on 3 different rolls of film. The other images were under different enough lighting conditions, i.e., indoors and pre-dawn, that the profiles did not apply.

I have found that the negative MUST be white balanced under the Adobe Standard profile before applying the inversion profile. I use the unexposed frame outside the image for white balance.https://drive.google.com/open?id=1bSkl6lNTxeoXGAxEBEnMb4xWIzE3IRg2

Paste the XMP files into a folder in the location below, then restart Lightroom and they should appear in the Profiles Browser under the heading "Sample Film Negative Profiles".
Windows: C:\ProgramData\Adobe\CameraRaw\SettingsMac:/Library/Application Support/Adobe/CameraRaw/Settings
Translate
Todd Shaner
Legend
May 25, 2018 2:11 PM UTC
Jeff, can you post a share link to a few of your LUT based film profiles? This will allow others here using camera film capture (self included) to give them a quick try. Thank you!
Translate
Inspiring
May 24, 2018 10:55 PM UTC

With the 7.3 release of Lightroom Classic and addition of profiles, Adobe have almost given us the ability to invert negatives in Lightroom. We can create inversion and color correction LUTs in Photoshop then bring those into Lightroom as profiles for one-click inversion and color correction in Lightroom! The sliders still work backward, but no more messing with the Tone Curve.

http://www.cuchara.photography/blog/2018/5/one-click-inversion-of-color-film-negatives-in-lightroom

Translate
Legend
Apr 25, 2018 1:09 AM UTC
No good Johan!

Although inverting the tone curve does do the job of changing the negative into a positive, it is at best a 'kludge' to overcome a serious deficiency in Lightroom that has been requested by customers and ignored by Adobe for the past 6 years.

I can photograph a film negative with my macro lens and a slide copying attachment - works very well, producing a raw copy. Importing into Lightroom, I apply the negative tone curve to get a positive. Making a few more adjustments, being mindful of the reversing of some develop adjustments, I can get something that looks pretty reasonable.

Now I'd like to apply a preset to give the image a different look - oh crap! Only one tone curve can be applied, obviously, and now my negative tone curve has been obliterated, making my image a punchy negative. Not a good look!

This is why Lightroom needs a real NEGATIVE control, so that the develop adjustments aren't all screwed up and we can still apply presets as normal.

How hard is this? Has Adobe only got one programmer working on Lightroom who is completely overwhelmed by the volume of bugs and very good ideas being reported here.

Come on Adobe wake up. Six years is far too long for a very sound feature to be implemented in Lightroom. It's not difficult - just about every image editing tool has a NEGATIVE function! Why not Lightroom?

So sick of the Adobe ignoring its customers, but still taking our money and using us to test their sloppy programming, only to be mostly ignored when we report problems that should be fixed in a very short time frame. The silence from Adobe says it all - don't care as long as you mugs keep paying.
Translate
JohanElzenga
Community Expert
Community Expert
Apr 21, 2018 9:54 AM UTC
There is, or at least you can simply make one: create an inverted curve, so a curve that goes from top left to bottom right. Save it in a preset.
Translate
-- Johan W. Elzenga
Participant
Apr 21, 2018 9:01 AM UTC


Hello Lightroom team! It would be quite handy for me, if there was an "Invert" command in the Develop module of Lightroom. (especially for B&W images) Please?

Thank you.
Translate
Todd Shaner
Legend
Apr 16, 2018 2:02 PM UTC
Steve in your reply earlier you said, "Could you go over this camera procedure again.  I guess I could put one of my 5 cameras to use.  Like Jack's, my v850 is a good one but I agree it might be a tad slower than your camera procedure.   So now I am interested in your speedier concept, rerun it?" 

Sounds to me you might like to give scannerless film capture a try, correct? I replied with a link to detailed information and materials to do so. No one's asking you to change your workflow.

Also the two OPs could care less that some users don't see the value in using camera based film capture. They've both made a simple request that would be very useful for anyone using a scannerless film processing workflow:

Ability in LR/ACR to Invert the Image data and have the Develop controls operate normally and not reversed.

Most of the "high-quality" film scanners (Nikon, Minolta) have been discontinued. Users seeking high-quality and expedient film scans can assemble a scannerless system very inexpensively. More details at the link I provided and on the Web. ;>)

Todd Shaner, ACP & Champion
Translate