Report inaccuracy or allow ratings/reviews on Adobe Stock assets

I’ve been extremely frustrated by misleading Adobe Stock graphic descriptions. This probably just applies to vectors. The platform is starting to be OVERRUN with AI-generated graphics claiming not to be AI. These typically look great on the preview, but once you download them, zoom in, and try to edit them it’s extremely obvious that they’re AI. Mostly because they’re always put together in a sloppy way that’s hard to edit, and don’t look nearly as good close up. I have on numerous occasions downloaded 20+ assets before I could find one that wasn’t AI, despite having the “exclude generative AI” filter on. Additionally, I’ve downloaded a ton of icons that claim to have editable strokes but don’t, and various graphics claiming to have editable text that don’t. I can’t even imagine how frustrating this must be for people who buy download packs rather than having a subscription.

I understand that your team probably doesn’t have time to review every asset that gets posted, but it seems that stock artists are using that to their advantage to get downloads from people who wouldn’t actually want to use the asset. I always want to report these inaccurate descriptions, but you can only report copyright infringement. The assets I’m referring to do not need to be removed from the site, just labeled correctly. I imagine that adding a report option for “inaccurate description” would be the easiest way to handle this, but alternatively I think allowing reviews and/or ratings could also help with this issue.