Skip to main content
EdwardJohnAllen
Inspiring
June 11, 2011
Open for Voting

P: Auto Import to folders organized by date

  • June 11, 2011
  • 28 replies
  • 3291 views

The Auto Import feature could be really useful but it does not allow users to handle files in the same way as the "standard" import routine within Lightroom, and this makes is problematic to use.For example:I use a Canon 7D which auto imports images into the "final destination" folder, then when I open Lr I can run the Standard import routine to apply metadata & presets etc. The cataloguing structure I use is a main folder named 2011, and each new batch of images goes into a separate folder named automatically by the date the image was shot, which makes things really easy.Auto Import does not appear to allow me to replicate this simple and effective workflow, and it would be really useful if it did.Any suggestions welcomethanks for your interest

28 replies

Lex.Sibul
Participant
May 8, 2023

Adding my voice to the pile.

Would've been really cool to have this work in tandem with syncthing syncing photos from my camera.

Participant
April 5, 2023

I also wanted this feature and found this thread.

 

I don't *like* this solution but it works for me. 

  • Inside of Lightroom, "Select All" on my autoimport folder
  • Delete all photos from lightroom
  • Run a "normal" import against my autoimport folder using "move"

 

The above allowed me to get the pictures organized in the folders I normally expect them in and it seems to auto find duplicates if I run the import from my camera as well.

Uhl
Inspiring
February 1, 2023

I can't believe how old this request is, so not sure if my reply will help, but FWIW…

 

Please add the ability to organize by date and choose the folder naming scheme for auto imports, just like you can with a manual import. Basically, add these two controls (and their functionality) to the Auto Import Settings dialog:

 

dw24154351
Known Participant
November 19, 2020

On the issue of feature requests and bugs....

Had a quick chat with a friend with decades years of experience in UX. The challenge from their experience is summed up by discovering that forward looking companies don't typically look backwards. Old bugs aren't on the table.

There's a challenge here because the user community eventually loses motivation to report. Some people don't know how to report. Or, you find a work around, you just cope with it, you decide not to do that, you move to another product.

Fundamentally, there needs to be an internal champion who is prepared to take on the challenge and own the problem. In the ideal case, they have enough product experience that they could be seen as a subject matter expert for the product. 

They all use a voting / count system to figure out whether to pay any attention to an issue/bug. So to paraphrase, every vote counts, you need to  vote.  

This forum is the place to be the squeaky wheel.

But don't squeak just to vent, you need to articulate the problem in repeatable steps, what is the observed outcome, what did you expect to happen and what is the (business/design) impact?

Use a numbered list to define the steps you went through.

Developers need specific scenarios and use cases to test. They need to find bugs in a methodical repeatable way. They need enough detail to find the edge cases.

There's also the challenge where the end user and the internal developer don't use the same terminology....

Inspiring
April 22, 2019
Love this idea. Can we get it some love, please?
Inspiring
February 11, 2018
What would we need to do to get this feature request to the top of the pile? I reckon that many users would appreciate it once they knew about it and this minor implementation was made to make it more usable
RikkFlohr: Inactive
Inspiring
February 10, 2018
And, Ben's role at Adobe has changed from what it was...

That isn't to say it isn't a valid idea just not one a decent number of users have piled onto.
Victoria Bampton LR Queen
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 9, 2018
Ben is indeed still working for Adobe. It'll be a matter of priorities. In 7 years, this issue has only managed to garner 19 votes, which means not many people care, so it hasn't made it to the top of the pile.
Victoria - The Lightroom Queen
Participating Frequently
January 30, 2018
Okay - it makes sense from a categorizing point of view, but:

why does nobody work on a solution ?
As this feature is allready implemented for "normal" imports it shouldn't be difficult to implement this for auto-imports, too ...
RikkFlohr: Inactive
Inspiring
January 30, 2018
@Ralf Bruechmann,

Yes, it is. 

This particular feature request has accumulated 19 votes over the past 7 years.  How do we know that? - because all of the threads requesting the same feature have been accumulated and counted as a group (see the top of the page).  If instead there were 19 disparate posts scattered across 7 years, would Adobe have any easy way to determine the strength of support for a particular feature.?

Whether it is a Problem which links to a bug, a Question that links to an answer, or an Idea that links to a Feature Request, aggregating them makes it easier for customers to find definitive answers.  If you are searching for "Auto-Import Folder Organization?" would you rather find a single thread that contains the whole of subject including Votes for, comments made by Adobe Staff, and potential workarounds, or would you rather search and find a dozen or more posts that might contain no answers, or only partial answers? 

Adobe's system for tracking issues and requests works best when a single bug, feature request, or point of user confusion tracks to a single source of customer-supplied information.  That way, when it is fixed, implemented, or answered, everyone on the thread receives the answer.  Let's say for this thread, that 19 people have asked and that another 25 (following) are interested in the answer. Let's also say that Adobe implements the features, with a single post to this aggregated thread, they can notify everyone of the implementation-regardless of how long ago they made the post.

The length of time a thread has been active (or in this case inactive) matters less than the total and continued support of a request.  A chorus is always louder than a single voice.