P: Support scalable user interface UI for high resolution monitors

Hey Chris, here is another one for you to redact.
That action, is of course, called "Protecting an Empty Barrel"
To the other reads here:
Redaction and 'Stone-Walling' are the only responses you will get here.
They blame MS for their problems. That is nothing more than an old fashioned 'monkey pass'. As early as 2009, MS addressed increased monitor resolution when using Windows API/GUI interface. Apparently, that guidance has been ignored. The real problem is an ever increasing unhappiness of the Adobe user base that is now being forced into a decline due to Adobe management's patent indifference.

And Lightroom has a much simpler UI than Photoshop or Illustrator -- yet Lightroom still has a lot of complaints about not scaling correctly on high resolution displays on Windows. Making false comparisons really isn't helping.

We have told you that we are continuing to work with Microsoft on the issue. As soon as we have something that we can share, we will let you know.

Lightroom doesn't have the problem either.

Based on the MS quote, posted by me earlier and subsequently redacted by you, this is not the recommended protocol for accessing the Windows API/GUI functions.
So, you need to scale your GUI accordingly, and stop blaming MS while not following their recommendations that encourages users to run their monitors in native resolution mode.

That's what happened with me. I found out after I purchased a high dollar laptop only to find out through a forum the reason I couldn't read the UI is because no one can. Then I renewed my faith in Adobe only to find out the representative I chatted with lied to me about the Creative Cloud version being issue free, even after I asked him three time about the micro UI on high resolution screens. Talk about a company that doesn't communicate with itself, then you're talking Adobe!

I was thinking the same thing. You can easily pave 50 miles of highway if you start 3 years ago. Its like saying easy access to San Francisco and forgetting to tell customers that you haven't built the transcontinental railroad yet.

Point here Chris is that Adobe is not warning anyone about this and customers are making expensive purchasing decision base on this lack of knowledge.

Yeah, well this has been a problem for years... You can pave 50 miles of highway n years...

No, Photoshop has very modern technology. But we are dependent on the OS operating correctly. And when the OS doesn't work correctly, we have to work around the problems in the OS, or work with the OS vendor to get things fixed so they work correctly. In this case, we could not work around all the OS issues.

The message keeps getting repeated, but you don't seem to listen: We are continuing to work with Microsoft on this issue and will let you know when we have something that we can announce.

AGAIN, because Illustrator does not use the native OS controls, and has simpler needs for the UI APIs than Photoshop does.

What you are asking is like "why does it take less time to change shoes than to repave 50 miles of highway"?