Product ideas

Voltem com o painel de gerenciamento de cor antigo, ou deixem a opção de escolhermos qual queremos. essa nova aba de cor está ruim.Open for Voting

era muito mais fácil, intuitivo, e funcional o antigo 

I would like a horizontal scroll bar in the Layers Panel.Open for Voting

When paths get nestled (outline or bullet style) so deep, I have to widen the whole panel just to see and select them. (yes I made this group of groups specifically to show what I mean)Less panel space on screen is best, please add a horizontal scroll bar. Thanks!See the paths are cut off and I cannot see the name or the image and there is no horizontal scroll.Here I had to widen the entire panel just to see the nestled groups and paths.  

Provide better instructions for the Pass Through blending modeOpen for Voting

For groups, Pass Through is Normal!For groups, Normal is Abnormal!That paradox made it hard to me to understand Adobe’s user manual on this topic (here), which seemed to be describing the opposite of what actually happens.I’ve attempted a clarified version below (which would constitute a separate subsection, specific to groups):Specify a blending mode for a groupWhen you choose the Normal blending mode for a group, you adopt the normal order in which the image components are put together. Normally, all of the layers in the group are put together first. The composite group is then treated as a single image and blended with the rest of the image using the selected blending mode. Therefore, none of the adjustment layers or layer blending modes inside the group will apply to layers outside the group.By default, instead of Normal, the blending mode for a group is Pass Through. The group’s adjustment layers and layer blending modes are applied first, before any compositing, and therefore affect layers outside as well as inside the group. 

P: Allow searching by "Exposure Bias" in the Lightroom Classic Metadata Library FilterOpen for Voting

Exposure Bias is not currently a searchable field, pleaseinclude it in the Metadata Library Filters. Multiple reasons why this is useful, from photographers who use bracketing, and want to sort through images at 0ev, using fixed exposure compensation on shoots and wanting to select and increase exposure in sets. The list goes on. As this is a Metadata field, and can be displayed in cells, please allow filtering by it too. Thank you.

AI Video Upscaler for Premiere ProOpen for Voting

Dear Premiere Pro Team,Let’s be honest—it's time to catch up with the competition and bring Premiere Pro to the forefront of AI-powered video editing.While some recently introduced features may seem trendy from a marketing standpoint, they don’t always reflect the actual needs of working editors who spend hours in front of the timeline.One truly useful and long-requested feature is an AI Video Upscaler.This would allow users to upscale lower-resolution footage to higher resolutions with intelligent detail enhancement—something that is already being done effectively in tools like DaVinci Resolve.Please consider implementing AI-based upscaling in future versions of Premiere Pro. I’m confident that millions of users around the world would greatly appreciate such a practical and powerful improvement.Best regards,Paul Styler

Ability to copy text from resolve fonts, missing footage etc dialogue boxesOpen for Voting

The ability to copy the text from the 'resolve fonts' dialogue,  the missing footage / relink media dialogue and missing effects. dialogue. Both Premiere and AE.Very useful for communicating/requesting with other team members or copying to search for fonts etc.. 

I want to be able to arrange Highlights in Color Management by myselfOpen for Voting

It should be able to arrange the Highlights in Color Management, big difference between Exposure and Hightlights.

P: (AI) Remove Power Lines, Overhead Cables, and WiresOpen for Voting

Love the new feature for AI distractions of people and reflections.. Lets expand on that!!   As a wedding photographer I am constantly removing power lines, stop signs, or just signs in general, exit lights.. It would HUGE if these were added as additional AI options for distraction removal. Feels like it would be a fairly easy addition.    Posted a screenshot as an example.. AI generative fill defintely takes care of it no problem but would save time if we didn't need to manually select it. 

Betaのカラーパネルに、DaVinciの標準搭載のノイズリダクションに類する機能がほしい。Open for Voting

ディテールを残したノイズ除去があることで、カラー編集の優位性がDaVinciにかなりあると感じました。いろんな環境で撮った素材を編集する際に、ノイズ処理が必要になるケースが多く、クオリティを担保するのに現状外部のツールありきでの制作になっている点が否めません。今回のアップデートに際して、ノイズ除去の正式搭載を希望します。AIによるノイズ除去や逆にグレインの追加もできると、映像制作ユーザーの使い勝手がまた向上するのではと感じています。

Transitions on graphics and titlesOpen for Voting

The transition options between video clips is impressive. We need the same thing on titles and graphics, please.

FEATURE REQUEST: Apply to selectedOpen for Voting

​Please, add this tiny item to the Effects panel context menu:So that anyone can select clips or cuts and add a selected effect or transition in one button-click. It’s time.​

Mesh warp grid should be the size of the layer, not the comp.Open for Voting

It would be great if Mesh Warp’s grid could be defined manually, without having to match comp/precomp sizes.

Within the new color mode, use scroll wheel to control adjustmentsOpen for Voting

From what I can see so far, I think the new Color Mode within Premiere Beta has some awesome features that will make color grading easier, but the controls are a little bit difficult to use.  Keeping the existing controls, it would be great if users could also hover over each color control wheel and use the middle mouse scroll wheel to adjust them.  For bidirectional controls, regular scrolling could adjust vertically and scroll + shift could adjust horizontally.

Can no longer change Theme UI Color in After Affects?Open for Voting

Hi:   Up until the latest update (2025) for After Effects. I was able to change my Theme UI Color. This link shows a video of how you used to able to change the Theme UI Color: (Mod note: Link removed)   I contacted an Adobe Agent and he said several changes were included in this latest update of After Effects. He said to file a feature request here in hopes of getting that feature back again. The After Effects Version I am using is: 25.0.0 (Build 53) and I am running it on a PC with a Windows 11.  This may not seem like a big issue to some people but it's something I got used to as part of my workflow.  If you could bring this feature back it would greatly be appreciated!   Mod note: Please do not condone the use of internal engineering tools like Console. The link showing how to change engineering settings in the UI has been removed. The text was also modified. Thanks.

クリップの音声にコンスタント・パワーをかけた後、調整レイヤーなどを上に被せようとドラッグした際にコンスタント・パワーの開始地点、終了地点で引っ掛かりクリップの先頭に合わせしづらいのを直してほしいです。Open for Voting

Suggestion for Contextual Task Bar Behavior with Remove Option in PhotoshopUnder Review

I truly appreciate the recent addition of the "Remove" option in the Contextual Task Bar. However, I would like to suggest a small but meaningful improvement to enhance user control and experience. Currently, the Remove Option in Contextual Bar works via Generative AI (cloud-based), and the Contextual Task Bar reflects only this mode. It would be much more efficient and user-friendly if the Contextual Task Bar adapts based on the user's chosen mode of the Remove Tool. Suggestion:If the user has Generative AI turned ON, then the cloud-based Remove option should appear in the Contextual Task Bar. If the user has Generative AI turned OFF, then the on-device Remove option should be available in the same Contextual Task Bar instead of removing the feature altogether. This will provide a seamless workflow and give users better control, especially when they prefer offline or on-device operations.

Mono and Stereo audio tracksOpen for Voting

Hi everybody.I think the whole mono to stereo is a mess in premiere pro.If I look at Protools for example, there is clearly a difference between a mono and a stereo track. And, if you take two mono clips that you drag onto a stereo track, they'll fit in that stereo track and play stereo. And vice versa, if you take a stereo clip, on a stereo track, and you bring it over two mono tracks, they'll split and behave mono.Premiere is lacking this basic feature. Tracks are... I don't even know if they're mono or stereo. If you bring a stereo clip, it's stereo, if you bring a mono clip, it's mono.You can split a stereo clip by going into the audio attributes of the clip in the media bin, and make it play dual mono. But there's no way to take two mono clips (L and R side of a song for example), and make them behave like a stereo clip. In my case, I'm opening an AAF that has all the audio split out in mono, and now my whole session has a ton of mono clips, that I can't bring back to stereo. I've talk to customer support, and they assure me that this was not possible.So, would there be a way to make this happen? being able to take two mono clips, and dragging them into a stereo track, and vice versa?The fact that the split from stereo to mono has to be done at the clip level is ridiculous. That means that if you've forgotten to split your stereo track with 2 lavs from your camera before derushing for example, and you're now done after 2hours, and you want to split them... good luck, since changing them at the clip level won't affect the timeline. I've had to export an AAF, splitting it into mono, and reimport to solve that issue.Can the audio part of Premiere PRO actually be PRO?If splitting a stereo clip into two mono tracks can be done, why can't the other way be possible?Could there be a clear visual difference between a mono and stereo tracks, and then we can have the possibility of moving things around?Thanks!

Imagine Premiere have the ability to “SHY” ( hide ) video layers !Open for Voting

I have long wanted to see Premiere have the ability to “SHY” video layers.  Once you work in AE, you realize just how powerful a feature this is.  I contacted Jason Levine at Adobe about a year ago who agreed this is a great feature that would be welcomed by many in the Premiere Pro world.  When you work on projects with many layers, you quickly realize how good a feature this would be to have in Premiere.  Many users have templates they use daily with the same dozen of layers that sit there, locked but not out of sight.  Imagine being able to “shy / hide” those layers with a single click on a button.  Pure magic.  Adobe engineers, PLEASE give my idea a few moments of your time. Thank you.

Warp Stabilizer UI enhancement with progress barOpen for Voting

The Warp Stabilizer UI, in its “Analyzing” state, can be improved. Current behavior is to alternate text between “Time remaining” and “% complete / frames processed.” This is good data, but having to wait to see “the other thing” is annoying. Recommendation:Add a simple “progress bar” behind the text, using the secondary UI color (i.e., the same fill color from the Cancel button), which tracks along with the percent figure.  It will be subtle but visible and will not impact text readability. Remove the “alternating text” behavior. Let the text read simply: “3s ~ 76% ~ 309/404 ~ 5fps” -- the numbers should be self-explanatory enough.  But just in case: Also include an on-hover tooltip to display more verbose text for anyone who’s confused.This is more and better data, in the most likely priority order, in a smaller space. Thanks.

Show Clip Keyframes TIme Remapping as default instead of OpacityOpen for Voting

Hi everyone, I am a daily vlogger and almost every Vlog starts with some cinematics with speed ramps. I never edit the opacity of a clip in the timeline. Every time I want to do some speed ramps I have to right-click the clip > Show Clip Keyframes > Time Remapping > Speed. I am not able to do this for several clips at once. Each clip has to go through the process individually.  Is there a way to either set up the Sequence timeline to display the Time Remapping/speed keyframes by default or is there a way to set Show Clip Keyframes > Time Remapping > Speed as a keyboard shortcut. I have tried to find both options with no success. I know it is a small task to do but with daily vlogs every second saved counts. Searching here also didn't help Thank you,Mike

Recode Adobe "Helper Apps" to show under Other in macOS TahoeOpen for Voting

Creative Cloud installs (at least six  (6) helper apps/applets.   In macOS Tahoe, these create some confusion as many of them don’t open.   Please recode them to fall under Spotlight’s Other section  

Face refinement features like the FACETUNE app because its REALLY goodOpen for Voting

If you all haven't used the Facetune app, you're missing out. It's incredible. It can autotrack your footage and with just a few clicks do a great face refinement that includes a ton of stuff (Even more stuff than what DaVinci Resolve can do). It's really good. Adobe should just buy the FaceTune company and build it into Premiere. It seriously is a game changer. No masking/rotoing/tracking, or any other time consuming tasks. Seriously, it's a 10/10 for features and how well it works. It costs like $72/year though, so I canceled after the free trial.It blows my mind that Premiere isn't the leader in all of this. For the cost of Creative Cloud, Adobe should be the ones with all of these amazing features.PLEASE build into Premiere Pro quick-use features like the FaceTune app.Features that are a must from the Facetune app that are needed in Premiere (All of these auto-track and apply the effect with a slider bar for how much you want the effect):Smooth skin (Softens the skin on your face and evens it out to hide imperfections)Conceal (Blends in the areas under your eyes to hide wrinkles/bags)Vibrance (Adds vibrance only to the skin on your face)Glow (Adds a nice glow only to the skin on your face)Smile (Makes teeth whiter)Eyes (Can brighten, sharpen and increase the color of your eyes, as well as increase the white around the pupil.) Those are all MUSTS in premiere pro. They can be applied in literally seconds and auto track, it's amazing. You can then save the 'look' for future videos and apply it even faster with the settings you like. There are SOOO many other features like it can reshape parts of your face to your likely, change clothes, change hair, but those are honestly just bonuses. The list I mentioned above are the things that would be a massive help for video editors. Literally every client edit my production company does we spend HOURS on face refinement. It takes forever. I would rate this as an extremely important feature to have.

Feature Request: Run pipeline from previous node resultOpen for Voting

I’m new to Firefly, and I’m following along with the Adobe tutorial https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/platform-learn/tutorial-one-adobe/production/crpr7/ex1. I noticed that each time I added nodes to the pipeline, I had to re-run the entire thing. The first step is Remove Background from an image - I already know this works the first time I run it, so as I’m experimenting and iterating on building the pipeline I want, this step doesn’t need to re-run. Yet, it re-runs every time, wasting credits and time.What would be nice is if the output from previously-run nodes can be used for subsequent runs. In the Background Removal example, lets say I have a background replacement after that using Composite Images. I run the pipeline, and see that those nodes do the job correctly, but now I need some color correction, so I add an Auto Tone node before the final image output. I already know the background removal and composite nodes work, so instead of running them again, I would like to just run the pipeline from the Composite node and re-use those results.This would help during the process of building a pipeline out and experimenting with different nodes, inputs, prompts, and outputs - which is an important part of building a pipeline that works the way you need it to. IT would reduce the amount of time you have to wait to test changes to a pipeline, and also reduce the cost of generations where you already know that a step is working properly. I could see this experimentation process becoming costly and hindering users’ ability to successfully build complex pipelines with the current “re-run everything every time” workflow.

Bug where video placement size changes depending on board zoom (Kling-generated video)Open for Voting

■ タイトル / TitleBoardのズーム倍率によって動画配置サイズが変動する不具合（Kling生成動画）Bug: Video placement size varies depending on board zoom level (Kling-generated videos)■ 概要 / SummaryFireflyBoardにて、Klingで生成した動画をBoard上に配置する際、Boardの表示倍率（ズーム率）によって動画の配置サイズが変動してしまう。When placing Kling-generated videos on the FireflyBoard, the size of the video varies depending on the board's zoom level.■ 発生環境 / Environment FireflyBoard 動画生成：Kling / Video generation: Kling ブラウザ：Chrome / Browser: Chrome ■ 再現手順 / Steps to Reproduce FireflyBoardを開く / Open FireflyBoard 任意の画像を配置する / Place any reference image Boardをズームインした状態でKling動画を生成・配置 　→ 画像と比較して、やや大きいサイズで配置される 　Generate and place a Kling video while zoomed in 　→ The video is placed slightly larger than the image     Boardをズームアウト（例：表示倍率1%） 　→ Zoom out the board (e.g., 1% zoom level) 同様に動画を生成・配置 　→ 非常に大きなサイズで配置される 　Generate and place a video again 　→ The video is placed at an extremely large size   ■ 期待される動作 / Expected Behavior Boardの表示倍率に依存せず、動画は一定サイズで配置されること 画像と同様の挙動で配置されること Video size should remain consistent regardless of board zoom level Behavior should match how images are placed (fixed size) ■ 実際の動作 / Actual Behavior Boardの表示倍率に応じて動画サイズが変動してしまう 特にズームアウト時に極端に大きく配置される Video size changes depending on the board zoom level Especially at low zoom levels, videos are placed at an excessively large size ■ 補足 / Notes 画像は常に一定サイズで配置されるため、動画との挙動に差異がある UI上の一貫性の観点でも改善を希望 Images are always placed at a consistent size, indicating inconsistent behavior with videos Improvement is requested for UI consistency

P: Manage/Delete Camera ProfilesReleased

hello! I recently added a custom camera profile to test out some settings in Lightroom CC. But now I want to delete that profile, is there a way to do so?