Build better products with our product team
I am writing to express my extreme frustration with the current state of Adobe’s generative AI content guidelines and filtering systems. As a professional creator and a long-term Adobe subscriber, I am increasingly finding the platform unusable due to over-zealous AI flagging that hinders legitimate, non-violating workflows.The current system is failing professional users in two primary ways:1. False Positives on Non-Violating Content I am frequently blocked from generating or editing content that does not violate Adobe’s stated Terms of Service. My work often involves professional documentation and educational content that requires specific technical imagery. The AI appears to be "playing it so safe" that it has become hyper-sensitive, flagging prompts that are entirely benign in a professional context.2. Lack of Actionable Feedback When a prompt is flagged or an image fails to generate, the error messages provided are vague and unhelpful. Simply stating that a prompt "may violate guidelines" without specifying which guideline or what part of the prompt is the issue is a waste of my time. As a professional, I need to understand the "why" so I can adjust my workflow.The Impact on My Workflow: The unpredictability of the Generative Fill and Firefly tools is reaching a breaking point. I cannot rely on a tool that treats professional creative work with the same restrictive lens as bad-faith actors. I am paying for a professional-grade suite of tools, but I am being met with a "walled garden" experience that assumes the worst of my intent.I urge Adobe to: Refine the sensitivity of the AI to better distinguish between professional/documentary contexts and actual policy violations. Provide specific feedback when a prompt is blocked so users can meaningfully correct their input. Implement an "Appeal" or "Professional Use" verification for accounts with long-standing history to allow for more flexibility in specialized fields. I hope to see these improvements soon, as the current environment is making it difficult to justify the continued use of Adobe’s AI features in my professional pipeline.
I just updated to Lightroom Classic 14.4 and although I do like the fact that I can Denoise without creating a DNG file, I still would like the option to select a series of images and menu: Photo>Enhance... to let it create dngs in the background which enables me to work on other images while it;s doing those. Currently, in 14.4 it takes a long time, especially if I have multiple images that I am denoising and I cannot do anything elese while it's doing that process. Is there still a way possible to do it the old previous way of creating a DNG Denoised file? Seems like an oversight when implementing this new way and slows down my whole workflow.
PLEASE ADOBE, get serious. We need this one so much and fast.My case (and I guess, many others):I'm doing some clean up in a ACES shot (32b EXR Seq), using After Effects (Last version) with Content-Aware Fill. When I create a Reference Frame (EXR, not PSD) it opens in Photoshop (Last version), and the problem starts:1) It looks all blown up in the highlights. When is going to be ACES Management automatic?2) After looking on several places, find a way to apply some color look up to appear similar to the AE preview in my DELL monitors. Ok, great! (?) Well, Not yet...3) When is Adobe going to LET US USE ALL THE TOOLS, including Generative AI in 32b?4) Ok, downgrading to 16b, simple isnt it? NO. The image changes and the aplied luts no longer looks the same. So...5) How to match color and levels in 16b to see the image THE SAME WAY I see it in AE? Work on it, and the save it in 32b again as it were before, and be able to see that EXR frame to update in AE to FINALLY be able to run "Generate Fill Layer" with the added Reference Frame(s).(Working on MacOS Ventura 13.6.7 with an 3,42 GHz Intel Core Processor, a AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16 GB, 128 GB 4000 MHz RAM and a 1TB M2 Drive. A (cursing removed) Machine)
I would love to see the Markers Panel to act more like a Excel Sheet Table. Especially becuase I tend to write a bit more into the "Name" field and that is caped at a fixed length and there apperas to be now way to make it expand to be able to see the full name or at least more of it. Maybe adding the abilitty to resize the left side of the markers panel next to the comments field?Maybe it'd be an option to make the name field also visually line break and display the full title (or at least give the option to do this)? Not sure what the solution would be that would be able to be added. But I'd like to see this updated / improved. Warm Regards,Chris
Currently in the SDK we have LrApplicationView.getSecondaryViewName()We need to have the same BUT for the “main screen” view and thus be able to detect which view we are in the Library module.So Please implement an API to get the current “main view”Hypothetical API LrApplicationView.getMainViewName()Returns the name of the view currently showing on the main screenReturn valueviewName (string) The name of the main view being shown, one of: "loupe", "live_loupe", "locked_loupe", "grid", "compare", "survey", "slideshow", or nil.
Apparently only a ETLA contract type can run reports and automate them. We have a government contract and is the only contract we can use….Why other large license contracts do not have this “feature” already is beyond me. I can go in and manually export to a csv, but cannot do a report for it. Let alone have it run monthly or quarterly and send to our admin team. Please put this on all contract types, it makes zero sense to not. Even a personal license type should be able to get their license use made and automated for their records.
The new quick apply box is a great addition and amazing to have a native command box, so amazing job!One feature which I feel would help give it a boost is to be able to change how the list order is shown. Mostly so it lists in order of recently used. Often projects will use the same effects or presets so it would be very useful to be able to hit enter on opening at the top, or a tap or two of the down arrow and already be where you need to be
Is it possible to modify the “default” parameter when we change the Image mode to “Bitmap” . It's now by default to “Diffusion Dither” but it must be “50% Threshold”. The mode “Diffusion Dither” cause many trouble, because the picture became with multiple dots (pixels) instead of a uniform area. This cause major problems in the printing industry and designer don’t notice this issue.
Here's my idea: Fix the bugs in your current software before spending time and MY money creating new AI crap nobody wants.
We often time use Photoshop to include paragraph texts in Photoshop files, so I request to add an abridged version of shape building capability like the one available in Illustrator. Presently we (at least I !) use Pen tool in Photoshop create some placeholders for putting shaped text in .psd files, which is a bit clumsy and many times not accurate, so a shape building capability will be a good addition.BTW, can the frame creating functionality be used for defining path? If so, please let me know.
When using the ‘new’ text styling expressions, it seems mandatory to get text from a second layer’s sourceText.Many of my projects depend on using names of Comps and Layers as text input.Why isn’t it possible to make a text layer use both techniques: input the string from Comp name or Layer name AND make use of text styling?Please add that.
파이어플라이 1000크레딧이 있는 데무료 생성 후 생성을 하는 순간 생성이 안된다고 오류가 뜨네요… 해결 좀 빠르게 부탁드립니다.
The only way to unlock an object is by clicking the lock icon on it.I think we should add a shortcut for unlocking selected objects as an alternative option.
Since the Film Impact effects have replaced the default effects in Premiere (Ex. Gaussian Blur, Directional Blur), and a huge part of dynamic link is the fact the effects transfer, the Film Impact effects should be ported to AE, or at the very least effects should translate to the AE versions like how Ultra Key will convert to Keylight when dynamic link is used. Premiere and AE have never had 1:1 effect continuity but it used to be true that every effect in Premiere was accessible in AE, but now unless you’re using the legacy effects even basic effects like Gausian Blur don’t even transfer, not to mention the new usefull tools that would be a life saver if they were compatible with dynamic link like Clone or RGB Split.
hican you guys add Film Impact Transitions and effects to After effectswhen i do Dynamic link from Premier i want to use them but theres not much in after effect( its like what Boris FX did with there transitions they come as effects in AE)
- Transition effects on film impact dashboard panel not working!!!- Enable mercury transmit shortcut for second monitor not working unless I open the preferences window- Default media scaling: fit to frame not working- Grow effect is croping the borders of the object a lot of the times- Marking the in on the source panel is not always resulting in the same frame when put on the timeline- audio scrubbing keeps turning on for some reason- increasing the crossfade audio breaks the clips if the timeline is too zoomed out
I’ve been extremely frustrated by misleading Adobe Stock graphic descriptions. This probably just applies to vectors. The platform is starting to be OVERRUN with AI-generated graphics claiming not to be AI. These typically look great on the preview, but once you download them, zoom in, and try to edit them it’s extremely obvious that they’re AI. Mostly because they’re always put together in a sloppy way that’s hard to edit, and don’t look nearly as good close up. I have on numerous occasions downloaded 20+ assets before I could find one that wasn’t AI, despite having the “exclude generative AI” filter on. Additionally, I’ve downloaded a ton of icons that claim to have editable strokes but don’t, and various graphics claiming to have editable text that don’t. I can’t even imagine how frustrating this must be for people who buy download packs rather than having a subscription. I understand that your team probably doesn’t have time to review every asset that gets posted, but it seems that stock artists are using that to their advantage to get downloads from people who wouldn’t actually want to use the asset. I always want to report these inaccurate descriptions, but you can only report copyright infringement. The assets I’m referring to do not need to be removed from the site, just labeled correctly. I imagine that adding a report option for “inaccurate description” would be the easiest way to handle this, but alternatively I think allowing reviews and/or ratings could also help with this issue.
The size of keyframes are often easy to miss when trying to click on them. A size preference would be nice to add to the timeline settings. At least twice the size would be ideal.
今天嘗試使用 Adobe Firefly 的音訊翻譯時,發現可以翻譯的語言沒有很多,特別是中文(華文)的翻譯上,很希望也能有繁體中文的音訊翻譯可以選擇,因為簡體中文與繁體中文使用的語境,在現實中有很大的不同,謝謝! I tried using Adobe Firefly’s audio translation today and noticed that the range of supported languages is quite limited. In particular, for Chinese, I really hope Traditional Chinese can be included as an option.Simplified Chinese and Traditional Chinese are used in very different real-world contexts, so treating them as interchangeable doesn’t reflect actual usage. It would be greatly appreciated if Traditional Chinese audio translation could be supported as well. Thank you.
Ter opção de editar a tradução em texto.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.